VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenancy Tribunal Confirms Termination and Rent Arrears Award

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal confirmed the termination of a tenancy and awarded rent arrears to the landlord after the tenant did not show up for the hearing.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant's failure to attend a hearing allows the Tribunal to proceed and confirm the landlord's claims.

Topics

tenancy terminationrent arrears

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.54

This rule allows a tenant to ask the Tenancy Tribunal to cancel a notice ending their tenancy. They must do this within 14 working days of receiving the notice, arguing that the landlord gave the notice because the tenant used their rights or complained about the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal confirmed the termination of a tenancy and awarded rent arrears to the landlord.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal confirmed the termination of a tenancy and awarded rent arrears to the landlord after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5180244 1

[2025] NZTT 5180244

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. The tenancy of [NAME] at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] has ended and possession returned to [NAME] at 8am Monday 3 March 2025.

2. [NAME] must pay [NAME] $1,907.00 immediately, calculated as shown in table below:

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 3 March 2025 $1,880.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $1,907.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,907.00

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5180244 2

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference. The calls to the tenant went unanswered. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the second call also went unanswered.

2. The landlord had sought termination and rent arrears but the tenant left and the landlord obtained possession on 3 March 2025. This return of possession is confirmed by order for the avoidance of doubt.

3. The landlord sought $1,880.00 in final rent arrears. The format of his rent book submitted as evidence did not make confirmation of this obvious. I advised him I would do some checksums and having done that I am satisfied that the rent arrears sought are more than likely lesser than what might be evidenced in another way. I therefore accept the claim and award $1,880.00.

4. The landlord has indicated a further application may follow for vacated issues. For that reason and his benefit so he can prepare accordingly, a party who brings a claim to the Tenancy Tribunal must prove on the balance of probabilities (more likely than not) that their version of events took place. Independent witnesses, corroborating documents and photographs are an important part of discharging this burden of proof.

5. The issue of evidence at Tenancy Tribunal hearings was considered by the District Court in Kaipo v Clarke & McCarthy (DC) TT233/02. Judge Mather stated:

“…[the applicant] needs to be reminded that like anyone who brings an application before a Tribunal or a Court, it is incumbent upon the applicant to provide the evidence necessary to prove the case. If the applicant fails to do that, then their application will be dismissed whether it has merit or not because it is up to the applicant to provide the necessary evidence. It is not up to the other parties and it is certainly not up to the Tribunal to extract evidence.”

Filing fee

6. [NAME] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

[NAME]

14 March 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5180244 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5180244 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord's claim for rent arrears was accepted because the Tribunal was satisfied after performing checksums.
  • The Tribunal proceeded with the hearing because the tenant did not answer calls, indicating adequate service had been completed.
  • The landlord was reimbursed the filing fee because they fully succeeded with their claim.
  • The tenancy was confirmed to have ended and possession returned to the landlord on 3 March 2025.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal confirmed the termination of the tenancy and awarded rent arrears to the landlord.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the termination of a tenancy and the payment of outstanding rent arrears.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to confirm the termination and award rent arrears because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 54

What was the argument that mattered most?

The most important argument was the tenant's failure to attend the hearing, which allowed the Tribunal to proceed.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they attend all hearings to present their side of the story.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The rent book submitted by the landlord was the key document used in the decision.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenancy Termination Confirmed - Tenancy Tribunal | VadeLab