Tenant Entitled to Bond Return After Appropriate Deductions Confirmed
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the landlord's agent must release the bond to the tenant after confirming that the deductions made by the landlord were appropriate under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to the return of their bond if the landlord's deductions are found to be appropriate.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord's agent to release the bond to the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord's agent to release the bond to the tenant after confirming that the deductions made by the landlord were appropriate under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5211312 1
[2025] NZTT 5211312
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT [Event location suppressed]
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Tenant
RESPONDENT: [redacted] [NAME] ([NAME] Family Trust)
Landlord
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.
2. The [COMPANY] is to pay the bond of $5,073.13 ([Bond number suppressed]) to [The tenant/s] immediately.
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing. The tenant who is in China had an approved representative.
2. The tenant has applied for the payment of the remaining bond held at the [COMPANY].
3. The tenant has a dispute with his former co-tenant concerning liability for rent. Disputes between tenants are not within the jurisdiction of the Tenancy Tribunal.
4. The tenant commenced proceedings against his co-tenant in the Disputes Tribunal. Apparently that application was dismissed for non-appearance. The tenant has applied for a rehearing in that Tribunal.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5211312 2
5. The tenant incorrectly named the landlord as the other party in the Disputes Tribunal application.
6. I am satisfied that the costs the landlord deducted from the bond (evidence produced) were appropriate and would have been awarded by the Tribunal had the landlord been required to make an application.
7. I have ordered the balance of the bond to be paid to the tenant.
8. As I have noted, his claim for rent from his former co-tenant must be dealt with in the Disputes Tribunal. He has no claim against the landlord for those costs.
9. I have suppressed the tenant’s name as his application for the bond has been successful.
[NAME] 12 May 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5211312 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5211312 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord's deductions from the bond were appropriate based on the evidence provided.
- The tenant had an approved representative attend the hearing while he was in China.
- The tenant applied for the payment of the remaining bond held at the company.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's dispute with his former co-tenant over rent liability is not within the jurisdiction of the Tenancy Tribunal.
- The tenant incorrectly named the landlord as the other party in the Disputes Tribunal application instead of his co-tenant.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord's agent to release the bond to the tenant.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the deductions made by the landlord from the bond were appropriate.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the landlord's deductions were appropriate and ordered the landlord's agent to release the bond to the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was whether the landlord's deductions from the bond were appropriate under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that any deductions from their bond are appropriate under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence produced by the landlord showing the appropriateness of the deductions mattered.