Tenant Entitled to Compensation or Repairs for Water Ingress
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the landlord must either fix water leakage issues or pay compensation to the tenant for failing to maintain the premises in a reasonable condition.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to compensation or repairs if the landlord fails to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines a landlord's responsibilities, including providing and maintaining the premises in a reasonable state of repair, considering the age and character of the property. It also requires landlords to comply with health and safety requirements and compensate a tenant for reasonable repair expenses if the disrepair wasn't caused by the tenant.
This section allows the Tenancy Tribunal to make various orders for claims within its jurisdiction. These orders can include declarations about rights or obligations, orders for possession of premises, or orders for one party to pay money to another.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord to either repair water ingress issues or pay compensation to the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord to either repair water ingress issues or pay compensation to the tenant due to failure to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair, as required by the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 1
[2025] NZTT 5024828
TENANCY TRIBUNAL - Auckland | Tāmaki Makaurau
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Tenant
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Landlord
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [COMPANY] As [COMPANY] must pay [NAME] and [NAME] $2,330.57 immediately, being rent refund of $75 per week from 26 July 2024 to 25 February 2025 and filing fee.
2. The landlord must carry out the following work to the premises, which must be completed by 31 March 2025:
a. Employ a licenced plumber or drain layer to investigate the cause of water ingress into the entrance foyer and provide a recommendation to redress the issue;
b. Follow the recommendation of the licenced plumber or drain layer.
c. Repair the door sill at the front entrance.
3. As an alternative to compliance with Order 2, the landlord must pay the tenant $3,500.00 immediately.
4. If the landlord fails to comply with either Order 2 or 3 above, then the tenant may undertake the work and charge the landlord the costs of this work up to $5,000.00. These costs may be set off against rent payable.
5. The weekly rent is reduced by $75.00 from the date of hearing until the repairs are completed.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 2
Description Landlord Tenant Compensation: Rent refund (26/7/2024 to 25/2/2025) $2,303.57 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $2,330.57 Total payable by Landlord to Tenant $2,330.57
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing. The landlord had the assistance of a mandarin interpreter.
2. The tenant claims that the landlord did not repair the water ingress issue at the entrance foyer. The tenant wants the problem fixed.
3. Under section 45(1)(a) - (ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986, the landlord has an obligation to provide and maintain certain standards and to comply with applicable requirements.
4. Where the Tribunal finds the landlord has failed to comply with any of these obligations, it may make an order for the landlord to carry out the work. See section 78(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
5. If the work order is not being made by consent of both parties, the Tribunal must also make a monetary order as an alternative to compliance with the work order. This provision does not apply to any work order, or part of a work order, in relation to smoke alarms, insulation, a failure to comply with a standard of fitness under section 120C Health Act 1956, or a failure to comply with any health or safety legislative requirement. See sections 78(2) and 78(2AA) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
6. A work order may also authorise the tenant to undertake the work and charge the landlord the costs of doing the work, if the landlord should fail to comply with the work order and alternative monetary order. A monetary limit must be imposed by the Tribunal on the amount of costs that can be charged. These costs can be set off by the tenant against rent payable. See sections 78(2AAB) and 78(2AAC)(b) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Has the landlord failed to comply with their obligations?
7. On the day that the tenants moved into the tenancy it was raining and they noticed water ingress in the entrance foyer. The issue was raised with the Property Manager. The tenants served a 14 days’ notice to remedy dated 16 September 2024 on the landlord. The landlord did not comply with the 14-day notice.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 3
8. The problem is that the entrance foyer floods when there has been consistent rain. The tenant said that the Property Manager has witnessed the flooding on multiple occasions. The area includes carpeted stairs which lead to the upstairs of the premises and a door which leads to the garage. The water pools at the front door and the sill of the front door had rotted at one end.
9. The tenant believes that the water is entering through a concrete block wall which has retained soil on the exterior side. The landlord said that he is not certain that the water is entering through the wall because he thinks that the wall had been waterproofed when constructed.
10. The landlord sought advice from a builder, even though the owner is a licenced Building Practitioner. I am told that the builder recommended that a trench be dug, and a drainage pipe laid along the wall. The owner did not agree with the advice given because photographs show that there is a drainage pipe and he says waterproofing must have been done at the time.
11. While the waterproofing may have previously been done it may no longer be effective and may need to be reapplied. A professional plumber and drain layer should be able to provide advice to fix the problem.
12. On 3 November 2024 the landlord carried out work at the premises which he says was to drain the water from inside. The work involved cutting a small channel in the concrete to enable the water pooled inside to drain out the front door where the sill was cut and a channel for the water to drain into the garage and presumably out the garage door.
13. This work did not solve the problem. It just means that the water will drain out after it has entered the premises. The tenants report a musty smell which is understandable given that the stairs just next to the area where the water pools are carpeted. Also, whenever the tenants enter the premises on days when the water has entered the premises, they will carry water on their footwear on to the carpeted stairs. The tenant says that draughts, rodents and insects have entered through the gap in the sill.
14. In the meantime, two weeks ago the landlord applied for demolition of the premises. Consent for that has not yet been granted. Therefore, as he had not applied for demolition before commencement of the tenancy, the landlord is not exempt from compliance with the Healthy Homes standards (see regulation 31, Residential Tenancies (Healthy Homes Standards) Regulations 2019.
15. The landlord had a Healthy Homes assessment carried out in 2022 and the report from that assessment was produced at the hearing. While the premises were certified as compliant with the Healthy Homes Standards in March 2022 since then there is evidence of water ingress, and the landlord has cut a large hole in the door sill of the front door. This would impact on the moisture ingress and drainage standard and the draught stopping standard.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 4
16. Section 45(1)(bb) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 states that the landlord shall comply with the healthy homes standards and section 45(1)(b) states that the landlord shall maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair. The landlord has failed to comply.
17. I have made a work order providing for the landlord to carry out the repairs after obtaining advice from a qualified plumber or drain layer.
18. Given the inconvenience and living conditions for the tenants I have reimbursed the rent paid at $75.00 per week. That rent reduction is to continue until the repairs are completed.
19. [NAME] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
[NAME]
25 February 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 5
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5024828 6
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant noticed water ingress on the day they moved in and reported it to the Property Manager, who did not comply with the 14-day notice.
- The landlord's attempt to fix the issue by cutting a channel in the concrete was insufficient as the problem persisted, causing musty smells and allowing draughts, rodents, and insects into the premises.
- The Healthy Homes Standards were impacted due to water ingress and the cut made in the door sill, indicating the landlord failed to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's claim that the wall had been waterproofed when constructed and did not need further action was rejected as ineffective given the ongoing issue.
- The landlord’s argument that they sought advice from a builder but disagreed with it because there was already a drainage pipe present was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the landlord to either repair water ingress issues or pay compensation to the tenant.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about water ingress issues in the entrance foyer of the rented property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the landlord must either repair the water ingress issues or pay compensation to the tenant because the landlord failed to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, specifically sections 45(1)(bb) and 78(1)(e), were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the landlord failed to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair, leading to water ingress issues.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek compensation or repairs from the landlord if the landlord fails to maintain the premises in a reasonable standard of repair.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the tenants' complaints about water ingress, the landlord's failure to address the issue, and the impact on the premises' condition.
