Tenant granted conditional termination order to avoid eviction
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal allowed a tenant to avoid immediate eviction by granting a conditional termination order. The tenant must repay rent arrears and other debts over time to keep their tenancy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a conditional termination order if they demonstrate the ability to repay rent arrears and other debts within a specified timeframe.
📖 What the law says
This section says that the Tenancy Tribunal must end a tenancy if the rent is at least 21 days overdue when the landlord applies, or if the tenant has caused or threatened significant damage to the property, or has assaulted or threatened the landlord or their family/agent/other occupier.
This section states that if a tenancy has ended, the Tribunal must issue an order giving possession of the property to the person who is entitled to it. However, such an order cannot be made more than 3 months after the tenancy ended.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted a conditional termination order allowing the tenant to avoid immediate eviction by repaying the debt over time.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal granted a conditional termination order to a tenant who owed rent arrears and other debts, allowing them to avoid immediate eviction by repaying the debt over time. The order will lapse if fully complied with, otherwise, the landlord can enforce possession.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5156011 1
[2025] NZTT 5156011
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] owes [COMPANY] $3,986.14 (“the debt”) being rent arrears of $3600.14 to 31 March 2025 and glazing of $386.00.
2. [NAME] must pay rent and the debt as follows:
a. By 113 weekly payments of $354.00, being $319.00 for rent and $35.00 for the debt.
b. A final payment of $350.14, being $319.00 for rent and $31.14 for the debt.
c. Payments will be every Wednesday, with the first payment on 02/04/2025 and continuing until 02/06/2027.
d. Should the current rent be varied by the landlord then the weekly payments shall be amended so that the tenant’s payments remain at the then current rent plus $35.00 per week.
3. Payments will be allocated in the following order: rent, rent arrears, and the glazing costs.
4. If the tenant fails to pay rent and an instalment of the debt repayment as required under Order 2 within 2 working days of the due dates:
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5156011 2
a. The tenancy at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] will terminate and the landlord will have immediate possession of the premises.
b. The balance of the debt will be payable immediately.
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing by telephone.
2. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy, rent arrears and reimbursement for glazing to two windows which the tenant accepts were broken by one of her children.
3. The tenant wants to repay the debt to avoid immediate termination.
Should a conditional termination order be made?
4. Where rent is at least 21 days in arrears on the date the application was filed, the Tribunal must make either a final or a conditional termination order. See section 55(1)(a) and (1A) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
5. I am satisfied the tenant will pay the debt within the period specified in the order and is unlikely to commit any further relevant breach. I have granted a conditional termination order.
6. The conditional termination order will lapse if it is fully complied with. If the tenant breaches the order, the possession order may be enforced for 90 days from the first breach. See section 64(4)(b) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
G Baker
01 April 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5156011 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5156011 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant demonstrated the ability to repay the rent arrears and other debts within a specified timeframe.
- The tenant proposed a structured payment plan covering both rent and the outstanding debt.
- The tenant accepted responsibility for the broken windows, showing willingness to address all issues.
- The tenant showed a commitment to regular payments, indicating a low likelihood of future breaches.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's request for immediate termination was denied in favor of a conditional termination order.
- The landlord's demand for full payment without a structured plan was not accepted by the tribunal.
- The landlord's argument for unconditional termination was overridden by the tenant's proposed solution.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal granted a conditional termination order to the tenant, allowing them to avoid immediate eviction by repaying rent arrears and other debts over time.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the tenant could avoid immediate eviction by repaying rent arrears and other debts over time.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant a conditional termination order because the tenant demonstrated the ability to repay the debt within the specified timeframe.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 55(1)(a) and 64(4)(b) were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the tenant's ability to repay the debt within the specified timeframe.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to avoid immediate eviction by demonstrating the ability to repay rent arrears and other debts over time.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the exact evidence or documents that mattered.