VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Must Allow Landlord Access for Inspection

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5485369 · Adjudicator J Yi

📌 In brief

A tenant was ordered by the Tenancy Tribunal to let the landlord enter their home for an inspection after refusing multiple notices. This decision highlights the importance of complying with legal requirements and respecting property rights under New Zealand law.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to enter residential premises for inspection if proper notice has been given and the tenant unreasonably refuses entry.

Topics

tenant rightslandlord access

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.48

This rule says that a landlord generally cannot enter a rented property while someone is living there, unless the tenant agrees or there's an emergency. However, a landlord can enter to inspect the property between 8 AM and 7 PM if they give the tenant notice at least 48 hours but no more than 14 days beforehand, and they can't do this more often than once every four weeks.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal ordered a tenant to allow access for inspection.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenant refused to allow the Landlord entry despite proper notice under Section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act. The Tribunal ordered the Tenant to permit inspection on a specific date, with penalties for non-compliance.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5485369 1

[2026] NZTT 5485369

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. The tenant must allow the landlord access to the premises at 11:00 am on Thursday 18 June 2026 for the purposes of inspection.

2. If the tenant fails to allow access to the premises, the landlord can engage a [NAME] to enter the premises. Any associated costs with changing the lock due to non-compliance with Order 1 can be charged against the tenant as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly.

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the hearing via videoconference. The tenant did not.

2. The landlord claimed that the tenant, without reasonable excuse, failed to allow the landlord to enter the premises despite having given proper notice under section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

3. The landlord provided evidence of having provided at least six inspection notices and two 14-day notices to gain entry for the purposes of inspection. However, the tenant did not allow entry once.

4. Therefore, the landlord had to resort to applying to the Tribunal for an order for access.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5485369 2

5. From the evidence provided, it seems that there are potential health and safety issues currently at the premises. It is important that the landlord is able to inspect the premises.

6. Therefore, I order for the tenant to allow the landlord access to the premises at 11:00 am on Thursday 18 June 2026.

7. If the tenant refuses to allow entry to the landlord at that time, the landlord can seek the assistance of a [NAME] to enter the premises. Any associated costs can be charged against the tenant as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly.

[NAME]

04 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5485369 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5485369 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant complied with reasonable conditions set by the landlord.
  • The tenant agreed to pay arrears and comply with specified conditions.
  • The tenant paid outstanding rent and returned the bond without disputes over damages.
  • A tenant's failure to pay rent justifies termination of tenancy under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
  • The tenant is required to leave the premises clean, tidy, and in good condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenant must allow the Landlord access to inspect the premises.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided that proper notice had been given for inspection and the Tenant unreasonably refused entry multiple times.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act was cited as the relevant law.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The Landlord's evidence showing repeated refusals by the Tenant despite proper notice was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the Landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants should comply with lawful requests for entry to avoid legal consequences.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Inspection notices and refusal letters were key pieces of evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, but only if there is substantial wrong or new evidence available within five working days.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It's advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer to understand your rights and obligations.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.