Tenant Must Tidy Lawns or Pay $1,000 - Tenancy Tribunal
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered a tenant to either clean up lawns at their rental property within 21 days or pay $1,000. This decision was made because the tenant did not maintain the lawns as required by the Residential Tenancies Act.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant must keep the lawns at their premises reasonably tidy under section 40(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
📖 What the law says
This section allows the Tenancy Tribunal to make various orders when dealing with a claim. These orders can include declaring the rights or obligations of a party, or ordering a party to pay money.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal ordered a tenant to tidy lawns or pay $1,000 for non-compliance.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to tidy lawns at their premises within 21 days or pay $1,000 for non-compliance. The decision was based on section 40(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 which requires tenants to keep their property reasonably tidy.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5474389 1
[2026] NZTT 5474389
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. The tenant must tidy the lawns at the premises and the berm outside the premises to a reasonably tidy standard within 21 days of the date of this order.
2. As an alternative to compliance with Order 1, the tenant must pay the landlord $1,000.00 immediately.
3. If the tenant fails to comply with either Order 1 or Order 2 then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to a maximum of $1,000.00. These costs may be treated as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly.
Reasons:
1. Ms [RESPONDENT] attended the hearing for the landlord which was held by way of videoconference. The tenant was phoned on the number provided but the call went to voicemail.
2. I am satisfied that the tenant is in breach of her obligations in section 40(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (the Act) by not keeping the lawns (front, back, and berm) reasonably tidy. I consider it appropriate here to make an order for the tenant to carry out the lawn tidying work: section 78(1)(e) of the Act.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5474389 2
3. Where, as here, the work order is not being made by consent of both parties, the Tribunal must also make a monetary order as an alternative to compliance with the work order: sections 78(2) and 78(2AA) of the Act. The landlord provided evidence to support the estimated cost of between $900.00 and $1,000.00 to have the lawns tidied. Given the length of the lawns, the work is likely to include slashing the grass, clearing it, and then mowing the lawns.
4. If the tenant fails to tidy the lawns within the time specified or does not pay the alternative monetary order, being the maximum estimated costs to have the lawns tidied, then the landlord may undertake the work and claim the costs of doing the work up to the monetary limit of $1,000.00: sections 78(2AAB) and 78(2AAC)(a) of the Act.
[NAME]
09 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5474389 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5474389 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant’s Tenancy Terminated Due to Abandonment and Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Claim Against Absent Tenant
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Repair Costs After Rehearing
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Return Bond
- Tenancy Tribunal Claimant wins rent dispute: Tenant ordered to pay $7,856.15
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Fees
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Dismisses Landlord's Claim Due to Non-Attendance
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Dismisses Tenant’s Application Due to Non-Attendance
- Tenancy Tribunal Claim Dismissed: Tenant Failed to Attend Hearing
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Rejects Tenant’s Compensation Claim
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant complies with legal notices and requirements.
- Tenant provides evidence to support their claims.
- Tenant is liable for rent arrears, utility charges, and damages.
- Tenant must comply with tenancy obligations at the end of a lease.
- Landlord entitled to recover unpaid rent and fees if tenant does not appear in court.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Tenant fails to attend scheduled hearings without valid reason.
- Tenant's application dismissed due to lack of evidence or non-compliance.
- Tenant is not entitled to compensation for terms not explicitly agreed in writing.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal ordered the tenant to tidy up the lawns or pay $1,000 for non-compliance.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over lawn maintenance.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on evidence that the tenant had not kept the lawns reasonably tidy as required by law.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 40(1) and 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The landlord's evidence showing the tenant had not kept the lawns tidy as required by section 40(1).
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants must keep their property reasonably tidy, including lawns and berms, to avoid legal action.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photos showing the state of the lawns were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only if there was a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice occurred.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer.
