Tenant Not Liable for Garage Door Damage Beyond Economic Life
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant was not responsible for replacing a damaged garage door because the door was over 50 years old and considered beyond its economic life, meaning it had no remaining value.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is not liable for damages to a property item that is beyond its economic life.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal dismissed the claim for damages related to a garage door, finding it was beyond its economic life.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a claim for damages related to a garage door, ruling that the tenant was not liable as the garage door was beyond its economic life and thus no residual value existed.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4991110 1
[2025] NZTT 4991110
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT MANUKAU | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI MANUKAU
APPLICANT: [redacted] Agent For [COMPANY]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. The tenant has been careless and caused damage to a garage door. However, due to the age of the garage door and the fact that it is beyond its economic life, I can not award any costs for the replacement garage door.
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
2. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
3. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
4. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4991110 2
four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
5. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
6. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
7. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
8. The tenant acknowledges that she caused damage during the tenancy to the garage door. The tenant accidentally reversed into the garage door damaging one of the arms of the door.
9. The landlord has replaced the garage door at the cost of $2530.00. The landlord believes that the tenant should pay some costs towards the replacement of the garage door.
10. The landlord did not have insurance at the time of the accident but says she would be happy if the tenant paid the equivalent of excess of $700.00.
11. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
12. The amounts ordered are proved.
13. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan. The garage was built at the same time as the house in the 1970’s. The landlord does not know if the garage door was original. Assuming that it was the original, that would make the door over 50 years of age. According to the IRD depreciation rate the garage is beyond its economic life. While the garage door may have still had a use beyond its expired economic life, there is no residual value in the garage door.
14. For these reasons I am not awarding the landlord any costs towards the replacement garage door.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4991110 3
15. [COMPANY] As Agent For [COMPANY] has not been succeeded with the claim I cannot reimburse the filing fee.
[NAME]
27 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4991110 4
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearing’s-appeals for more information on rehearing’s and appeals.
Rehearing’s You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4991110 5
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant accidentally damaged the garage door.
- The garage door was over 50 years old and beyond its economic life.
- There is no residual value in the garage door since it is beyond its economic life.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord claims the tenant should pay some costs towards the replacement garage door.
- The landlord replaced the garage door at a cost of $2530.00.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided that the tenant was not responsible for the cost of replacing the garage door because it was beyond its economic life.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the tenant should pay for the replacement of a garage door that was damaged during the tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant was not liable for the damage because the garage door was over 50 years old and considered beyond its economic life.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, specifically section 49B, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the garage door was beyond its economic life and thus had no residual value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case, as the claim for damages was dismissed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, if the damaged item is beyond its economic life, they may not be held responsible for its replacement.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.
