Tenant ordered to pay $145.15 in rent arrears
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $145.15 in rent arrears to the landlord. The landlord proved the amount owing through their rent ledger, and the hearing was conducted remotely.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is required to pay rent arrears as proven by the landlord's rent ledger.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears to the landlord.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $145.15 in rent arrears to the landlord, as proven by the landlord's rent ledger. The landlord attended the hearing remotely, and two attempts to contact the tenant were unsuccessful.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5154172 1
[2025] NZTT 5154172
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] $145.15 immediately, being rent arrears to 16 April 2025 as shown in the table below:
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $145.15 Total award $145.15 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $145.15
Reasons:
1. The landlord attended the hearing via remote teleconference.
2. Two attempts were made to contact the tenant on the telephone numbers provided. Both attempts were unsuccessful.
3. The landlord has applied for rent arrears and has provided rent records which prove the amount owing.
4. Having sighted the landlord’s rent ledger filed with the application I am satisfied that the tenant is responsible for the rent debt.
5. The claim for rent arrears is proven.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5154172 2
6. The landlord does not seek reimbursement of the filing fee.
[NAME]
16 April 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5154172 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5154172 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord provided a rent ledger proving the amount of rent arrears.
- The tribunal accepted the landlord's evidence without needing to hear the tenant.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant could not be contacted despite two attempts to reach them.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant was ordered to pay $145.15 in rent arrears to the landlord.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about unpaid rent arrears.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the landlord because the landlord's rent ledger proved the amount owing.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The landlord's proof of the rent arrears through their rent ledger was the most important argument.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case, the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have proper documentation of rent payments to avoid disputes.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The landlord's rent ledger was the key piece of evidence.