VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay $5,115.67 for Damages and Arrears

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered a tenant to pay $5,115.67 to a landlord for rent arrears, cleaning, and replacing damaged items. The tenant did not leave the property clean and tidy and did not replace missing items.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant must pay for damages and arrears beyond fair wear and tear.

Topics

rent arrearsproperty damagecleaning

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This rule states that a tenant must pay rent on time as agreed. It also requires the tenant to keep the rented property reasonably clean and tidy, and to leave it in that condition when moving out, removing all their belongings and rubbish.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $5,115.67 for various damages and arrears.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $5,115.67 for rent arrears, cleaning, and replacement of damaged items. The tenant failed to leave the premises clean and tidy and did not replace missing chattels.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5200832 1

[2025] NZTT 5200832

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT MANUKAU | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI MANUKAU

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

[NAME] must pay [COMPANY] $5,115.67 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 12 February 2025 $2,027.14 Cleaning $995.24 Rubbish removal $1,754.32 Toilet Holder Replacement $31.84 Shower Curtain Replacement $41.75 Latch Replacement $81.81 Repairs: Plaster Board Patch $129.54 Tyre Removal $54.03 Total award $5,115.67 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $5,115.67

Reasons:

1. The Applicant attended the hearing; the Respondent did not and it is understood that she now resides in Australia.

2. The landlord applied for rent arrears and compensation following the end of the tenancy.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5200832 2

How much is owed for rent?

3. The tenancy ended on12 February 2025. The landlord provided rent records that prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.

5. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish. In addition to extensive cleaning required, over seven cubic metres of rubbish was removed from the property (both internally and externally), plus tyres left at the property.

6. The following chattels were missing at the end of the tenancy: toilet holder, shower curtain, and a latch.

7. The amounts ordered are proved through photos and the invoice for vacation works completed.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

9. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

10. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

11. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5200832 3

applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

12. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

13. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: damage done to a plaster board requiring patch repairs.The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

14. The amounts ordered are proved.

[NAME]

09 June 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5200832 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit [NAME]/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5200832 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord proved the amount of rent owing at the end of the tenancy with rent records.
  • The tenant did not leave the property reasonably clean and tidy, nor did they remove all rubbish.
  • The tenant was responsible for extensive cleaning, removal of over seven cubic metres of rubbish, and tyres left at the property.
  • The tenant was responsible for missing items like a toilet holder, shower curtain, and a latch.
  • The landlord proved the amounts ordered for cleaning, rubbish removal, and chattel replacement with photos and an invoice.
  • The tenant caused damage to a plaster board that was more than fair wear and tear.
  • The tenant failed to disprove liability for the plaster board damage.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was ordered to pay the landlord $5,115.67 for rent arrears, cleaning, and replacing damaged items.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the tenant leaving the premises unclean and failing to replace damaged items.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant must pay for damages and arrears beyond fair wear and tear, as proven by photos and invoices.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v), 40(1)(ca), and 49B were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenant did not leave the premises clean and tidy and did not replace missing chattels.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they leave the premises clean and tidy and replace any damaged items before the end of the tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photos and invoices for vacation works completed mattered in proving the damages and arrears.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant Ordered to Pay $5,115.67 for Damages and Arrears | VadeLab