VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant ordered to pay $5,920.71 for rent arrears and damages

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $5,920.71 for rent arrears and damages to the landlord. The tenant was found liable for damages beyond fair wear and tear.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for rent arrears and damages beyond fair wear and tear.

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section states that a tenant must pay rent on time as agreed in their tenancy agreement. It also requires the tenant to keep the rental property reasonably clean and tidy, and to leave it in that condition when they move out, removing all their belongings and rubbish.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $5,920.71 for rent arrears and damages to the landlord, finding the tenant liable for damages beyond fair wear and tear.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5171212 1

[2025] NZTT 5171212

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT CHRISTCHURCH | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI ŌTAUTAHI

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [NAME] and [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] and [COMPANY] $5,920.71 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to and including 16 February 2025 $6,750.00 Cleaning $430.10 Lawns and Garden work $367.67 Floor repairs $225.69 Wal repairs $431.25 Washing line repairs $49.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Bond received by landlord $2,360.00 Total award $8,280.71 $2,360.00 Net award $5,920.71 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $5,920.71

Reasons:

1. [NAME] attended the hearing for the landlord. The tenants did not attend.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5171212 2

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

How much is owed for rent?

3. The tenancy ended on expiry of the fixed term on 16 February 2025. The landlord provided rent records which, together with [NAME]’s oral evidence, proves the amount owing.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean (including the carpets and oven), and did not leave the lawns and gardens reasonably tidy as required by section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (the Act).

5. The amounts ordered are proved by the production of invoices.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

6. To be successful in a claim for damage to the premises, the landlord must prove that damage occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they, or others at the remises with their permission, did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B of the Act.

7. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: the floor was damaged by groves being scoured into the wooden planks; there was a hole in the master bedroom wall; and the washing line bracket was broken. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for it.

8. The amounts ordered are proved by the production of invoices.

9. The landlord has been successful in its claims and is therefore entitled to payment of the Tribunal application fee.

R Merrett

12 May 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5171212 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5171212 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant owes $5,920.71 for rent arrears and damages.
  • The landlord provided rent records proving the amount owed.
  • The tenant did not leave the premises clean or the lawns and gardens tidy.
  • The tenant is responsible for damages such as floor grooves, a wall hole, and a broken washing line bracket.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant did not provide evidence to disprove liability for the damages.
  • The tenant did not attend the hearing to contest the claims.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was ordered to pay $5,920.71 for rent arrears and damages to the landlord.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about unpaid rent and damages to the rental property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided the tenant was liable for rent arrears and damages beyond fair wear and tear, as proven by the landlord's evidence.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) and 40(2)(a) were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the proof of damages beyond fair wear and tear, as well as the unpaid rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure that the rental property is left in good condition and all rent is paid on time.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included rent records, invoices for damages, and oral testimony from the landlord.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.