VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay $550.28 for Damages and Cleaning Costs

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay the landlord $550.28 for damages and cleaning costs after the tenant left the rental property in poor condition.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is responsible for leaving the premises reasonably clean and tidy and for any damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Topics

damagescleaningfair wear and tear

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This rule states that a tenant must keep the rented property reasonably clean and tidy during their tenancy. It also requires the tenant to leave the property in a reasonably clean and tidy condition and remove all rubbish when they move out.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $550.28 for damages and cleaning costs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $550.28 for damages and cleaning costs after the tenant failed to leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy at the end of the tenancy.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5190934 1

[2025] NZTT 5190934

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] as agent for [NAME] $550.28 immediately, as calculated in the table below:

Description Landlord Tenant Repairs: Walls and doors $570.95 Cleaning (including general cleaning, carpet cleaning and net curtains)

$940.63

Lock replacement $181.70 Curtain washing $230.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $1,950.28 Bond $1,400.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $550.28

2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,400.00 (6403508-023) to [COMPANY] as agent for [NAME] immediately.

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the hearing. The tenant did not attend and did not respond when telephoned on the number ending in 844.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5190934 2

2. I am satisfied that service has been adequately affected and the hearing proceeded without the tenant. See section 91B(2) and 92 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).

3. The landlord has applied for compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) RTA.

5. The landlord claims that the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy. Photographs have been provided in support of this claim. The landlord says that in particular, the carpet and curtains required washing/cleaning, together with cleaning throughout the property (including skirtings, windowsills, cupboards and benchtops). An invoice has been provided for $940.63, noting that this includes the general cleaning, carpet cleaning and washing of the net curtains. A further invoice has also been provided for washing the main curtains of $230.00.

6. The tenant did not return the keys for the back door. A replacement key was unable to be cut for this, and a new deadbolt had to be supplied and fitted at the invoiced cost of $181.70.

7. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

9. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.

10. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5190934 3

11. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

12. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

13. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

14. The landlord says that during the tenancy several small holes were created in the walls and doors throughout the property. The landlord was required to repair these at the invoiced cost of $570.95. Photographs of the walls have been provided in support of this claim.

15. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: Holes in the walls and doors. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

16. The amounts ordered are proved.

17. [COMPANY] as agent for [NAME] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

[NAME]

26 May 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5190934 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5190934 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, requiring extensive cleaning.
  • Several small holes were created in the walls and doors, which were more than fair wear and tear.
  • The tenant did not return the keys for the back door, necessitating a lock replacement.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's failure to provide evidence disproving liability for the damages.
  • The tenant's absence and lack of response to the tribunal's attempts to contact them.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant must pay the landlord $550.28 for damages and cleaning costs.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the condition of the rental property at the end of the tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant was responsible for leaving the premises reasonably clean and tidy and for any damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v), 40(2)(a), and 49B were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and caused damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure that the rental property is left clean and tidy and that any damage is reasonable wear and tear.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and invoices for cleaning and repairs were presented as evidence.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant Ordered to Pay Damages and Cleaning Costs - Tenancy | VadeLab