Tenant Ordered to Pay $876.21 for Repairs and Filing Fees
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $876.21 for repairs and filing fees after the tenant failed to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy, such as leaving the premises clean and returning keys.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is liable for the costs of repairs and filing fees if they fail to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy.
📖 What the law says
This rule states that a tenant must keep the rented property reasonably clean and tidy. It also requires the tenant, when moving out, to leave the property in a reasonably clean and tidy condition and remove all rubbish.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $876.21 for repairs and filing fees.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $876.21 for repairs and filing fees after the tenant failed to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy, including leaving the premises clean and returning keys.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5212793 1
[2025] NZTT 5212793
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] and [NAME] must pay [NAME] and [NAME] $876.21 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
Description Landlord Tenant Repairs: Window $400.00 House keys and remotes $449.21 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $876.21 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $876.21
Reasons:
1. The Landlord attended the hearing by video. The Tenants did not attend by video or answer the telephone calls made by the Tribunal.
2. The landlord has applied for compensation and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5212793 2
3. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.
4. The tenant did not return the keys and remotes for the garage. I note the Tenant was evicted. An invoice was provided to substantiate the costs to rekey the doors and provide new remotes.
5. The amounts ordered are proved.
6. The Landlord claimed for cleaning of the property. The Tenant also had a cat so the carpet required cleaning. An invoice was provided to prove the costs however there were no photographs of the property or outgoing inspection report to show that it required cleaning.
7. For this reason, the claim is dismissed.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
9. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
10. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
11. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
12. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5212793 3
13. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
14. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: Damaged window. A photograph of the window and an invoice for the repair was provided. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
15. The amounts ordered are proved.
16. As the landlords have been substantially successful, the Tenant shall reimburse the filing fee.
A Aiolupotea
06 June 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5212793 4
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5212793 5
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit.
- The landlord provided an invoice to substantiate the costs to rekey the doors and provide new remotes.
- The damage to the window is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
- The landlord is entitled to reimbursement of the filing fee if the tenant fails to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's claim for cleaning the property due to a cat was dismissed as there were no photographs of the property or outgoing inspection report to show that it required cleaning.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $876.21 for repairs and filing fees.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenant's failure to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy, including leaving the premises clean and returning keys.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant must pay the landlord $876.21 because the tenant did not return the keys and remotes for the garage and left the premises requiring cleaning.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) and 40(1)(ca) were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the tenant did not comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy, specifically failing to return keys and leaving the premises needing cleaning.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy to avoid having to pay for repairs and filing fees.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included invoices for repairs and the fact that the tenant did not return keys and remotes for the garage.
