VadeLab
DismissedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay Insurance Excess for Floor Damage

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal decided that the tenant must pay $627.00 to the landlord for the insurance excess related to floor repairs. The tenant admitted to causing the damage to the laminate floor.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for the insurance excess if they caused the damage.

Topics

tenancy disputesinsurance excess

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

📖 Technical summary

The claimant must pay the insurance excess for floor repairs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay the landlord $627.00 for the insurance excess related to floor repairs, as the tenant admitted to causing the damage.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5048208 1

[2025] NZTT 5048208, 5086229

TENANCY TRIBUNAL - Video Location

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Tenant

RESPONDENT: [redacted] For [NAME]

Landlord

TENANCY ADDRESS: 8 Ara Reti, Mangere, Auckland 2022

ORDER

1. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] As Agent For [NAME] $627.00 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Replace furnishings: Floor repair insurance excess $600.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $627.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $627.00

Reasons:

1. Both parties attended the hearing by video.

2. The landlord has applied compensation and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

3. The Tenant applied for a refund of the bond and compensation. The Tenant withdrew their claim at the hearing for the bond.

4. The property was a new build and the tenant was the first occupier. The parties agreed that the Tenant had caused damages to the laminate floor and the Tenant agreed to pay the insurance excess. The Landlord sought a repair

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5048208 2

quote, which came to $1237.10, and submitted an insurance claim with an excess of $400. The Tenant agreed to this amount however, the insurance company increased the excess to $1000, effective just three days before the Tenant moved out.

5. The Landlord submitted they sought legal advice which confirmed that the new excess was applicable, and they could claim an additional $600.00 as the tenant had not been properly notified of the change.

6. The Tenant refused to pay the new excess of $600.00. The Tenant then explained that she had previously overpaid $2000.00 into the Landlords bank account and the Landlord had directed some of this to cover the excess. The Tenant did not agree with the way the Landlord allocated the overpayment towards alternate avenues without the Tenant’s consent. The Tenant submitted the Landlord owed her $1000.00 in compensation.

7. The Landlord clarified this overpayment payment was allocated by reimbursing $1000.00 to the Tenant and the balance was allocated towards overdue rent and other outstanding payments. They provided a rent ledger to substantiate this and confirmation of the excess from the insurance company.

Is the tenant liable to pay the $600.00 for the outstanding insurance excess?

8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

9. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.

10. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

11. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

12. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5048208 3

13. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

14. In considering the evidence, I find the Landlord’s claim for compensation is proved on the balance of probabilities. There was agreement by the Tenant that she caused the damage to the floor. The way the overpayment of $1000.00 was allocated is not relevant in determining the Landlord’s claim for insurance excess. It is not a consideration under the Act. The Tenant caused the damage and therefore the Tenant owes the Landlord for the repair.

15. The Tenant’s claim for $1000.00 was not clear in terms of how the Landlord came to owe this amount. The Landlord provided a rent ledger to show where the overpayment was allocated however there was no specific evidence from the Tenant to support her claim.

16. The amount ordered is proved for the Landlords claim.

17. The Tenant’s claim is dismissed.

18. As the landlord has wholly succeeded in their claim, the Tenant shall reimburse the filing fee.

A Aiolupotea

24 February 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5048208 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5048208 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant caused the damage to the laminate floor.
  • The landlord's claim for the insurance excess was supported by the tenant's admission of causing the damage.
  • The landlord provided evidence showing the allocation of the overpayment towards overdue rent and other payments.
  • The amount ordered for the insurance excess was proven and supported by the insurance company's confirmation.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant claimed the landlord owed her $1000.00 in compensation but did not provide specific evidence to support this claim.
  • The tenant argued that she did not agree with how the landlord allocated the overpayment but this was not relevant to the claim for insurance excess.
  • The tenant's claim for a refund of the bond was withdrawn at the hearing.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant must pay $627.00 to the landlord for the insurance excess related to floor repairs.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the tenant was responsible for the insurance excess due to causing damage to the laminate floor.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant was liable for the insurance excess because they admitted to causing the damage to the laminate floor.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 49B was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's admission of causing the damage to the laminate floor was the central argument.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be liable for the insurance excess if they caused damage to the property during their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenant's admission of causing the damage and the insurance claim details mattered.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant Liable for Insurance Excess | Tenancy Tribunal | VadeLab