Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay $1,137.00 in rent arrears to the landlord. The landlord also received a filing fee reimbursement of $27.00. The tenant did not show up for the hearing.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is required to pay rent arrears as proven by rent records.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and awarded the landlord a filing fee reimbursement.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $1,137.00 in rent arrears to the landlord, as proven by rent records. The landlord also received a filing fee reimbursement of $27.00. The tenant did not attend the hearing.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5111748 1
[2025] NZTT 5111748
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] must pay [NAME] $1,137.00 immediately, being rent arrears to 31 December 2024.
2. The Bond Centre is to pay $370.00 from the bond (3174643-015) to [NAME] immediately.
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 31 December 2024 $1,480.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $1,507.00 Bond $370.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,137.00
Reasons:
1. The landlord attended the hearing by video. The tenant did not attend the hearing. An attempt was made to join the tenant to the hearing by telephone but the call went to voicemail.
2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears and has provided rent records which prove the amount owing.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5111748 2
3. [NAME] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
N Walker
25 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5111748 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5111748 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord proved the amount of rent owing by providing rent records.
- The landlord was reimbursed the filing fee because they fully succeeded with their claim.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision ordered the tenant to pay $1,137.00 in rent arrears to the landlord and awarded the landlord a filing fee reimbursement of $27.00.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about unpaid rent arrears and the landlord's request for a filing fee reimbursement.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the landlord because the rent records proved the amount of rent arrears owed by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The most important argument was the proof of rent arrears through rent records.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have proper documentation of rent payments to avoid disputes.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The rent records provided by the landlord were the key evidence in this case.