Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages to the premises. The tenant did not attend the hearing, and the landlord provided proof of the rent owed and the cost of repairs needed due to damage beyond fair wear and tear.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is liable for rent arrears and damages to the premises beyond fair wear and tear.
📖 What the law says
This section states that a tenant must pay rent on time, keep the property reasonably clean and tidy, and leave it in that condition when they move out, removing all their belongings and rubbish.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages to the premises. The tenant failed to comply with their obligations to leave the premises clean and tidy and to repair damage beyond fair wear and tear.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5146174 1
[2025] NZTT 5146174
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT CHRISTCHURCH | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI ŌTAUTAHI
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] As [COMPANY] $1,200.11 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $420.71 Carpet Cleaning – remove stains in living room $100.00 Cleaning – general (including oven and inside windows) $450.00 Rubbish removal and minor garden work $139.15 Repairs – repaint one bedroom wall $63.25 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $1,200.11 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,200.11
Reasons:
1. [NAME] and [NAME] attended on behalf of the landlord.
2. The tenant did not attend.
3. The landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5146174 2
How much is owed for rent?
4. The tenancy ended on Friday 6 December 2024 and the tenant paid rent to Sunday 3 November 2024
5. The bond was paid to the landlord, with the agreement of the tenant, to cover rent arrears.
6. The landlord provided rent records which prove the balance owing at the end of the tenancy (after the bond was received) being $420.71.
Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?
7. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
8. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
9. The landlord provided photographs and invoices to support the claims for general cleaning (including oven and interior windows), carpet cleaning, rubbish removal, council bin emptying and cleaning and some minor garden work.
10. The amounts ordered are proved.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
11. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
12. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
13. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
14. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5146174 3
tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
15. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
16. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
17. During the tenancy some damage was caused to a wall in one bedroom.
18. The landlord provided an ingoing inspection report which did not identify any damage to the walls of any bedrooms.
19. The landlord provided photographs to show the damage and an invoice for the repainting of one wall.
20. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
21. The amount ordered is proved.
22. As [COMPANY] As [COMPANY] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
S Steele
28 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5146174 4
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5146174 5
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant owes $420.71 for unpaid rent arrears.
- The tenant is responsible for the cost of cleaning the living room carpet, general cleaning, and removing rubbish.
- The tenant must pay for the repainting of one bedroom wall due to damage beyond fair wear and tear.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not attend the hearing, which likely weakened their ability to dispute the charges.
- The tenant did not provide any evidence to disprove the landlord's claims regarding the condition of the premises.
- The tenant did not prove that the damage to the bedroom wall was due to fair wear and tear or caused by someone else.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and damages to the premises.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about unpaid rent and the cost of cleaning and repairs needed due to damage to the premises.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant must pay the landlord for rent arrears and damages because the tenant did not comply with their obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(1)(e) and 49B were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The most important argument was that the tenant was responsible for leaving the premises clean and for repairing damage beyond fair wear and tear.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with their obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 to avoid similar penalties.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, invoices, and rent records were used as evidence to support the landlord's claims.
