VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant ordered to pay rent arrears and damages

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, water rates, cleaning fees, and damages for repairs after finding that the tenant breached their obligations under the tenancy agreement.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for rent arrears, water rates, cleaning fees, and damages for repairs if they breach their obligations under the tenancy agreement.

Topics

rent arrearswater ratescleaning feesrepairs

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(1)(e)Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and notifying the landlord of any damage or needed repairs. When moving out, a tenant must leave the premises in a reasonably clean and tidy condition and remove all their belongings and rubbish.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, water rates, cleaning fees, and damages for repairs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, water rates, cleaning fees, and damages for repairs after finding that the tenant breached their obligations under the tenancy agreement.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 1

[2025] NZTT 4966474

TENANCY TRIBUNAL - Papakura

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [NAME] and [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] As Agent For [NAME] $5,633.26 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 24 June 2024 $2,322.86 Water rates $319.45 Cleaning $753.15 Rubbish removal $430.39 Repairs: Hole in floor $300.00 Repairs: Hole in walls, scratch marks from dogs, painting and plastering

$750.00

Lock/key replacement $730.41 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $5,633.26 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $5,633.26

Reasons:

1. [NAME] for the landlord attended the hearing. The tenants did not attend.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 2

2. The tenancy began on the 31 March 2021 and ended in June 2024. At the beginning of the tenancy the house was brand new. The tenants lived in the home with their two children.

3. The tenancy agreement did not allow the tenants to have a dog.

4. The landlord has applied for rent and water arrears, compensation for cleaning, rubbish removal replacement keys and repairs and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

5. The landlord submitted copies of the entry and exit inspection reports and invoices for the work completed at the property.

How much is owed for rent and water rates?

6. The landlord provided rent records and water rates invoices which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy. At the end of the tenancy the tenants signed over the bond to the landlord. The amount of rent owing at the end of the tenancy was $5,122.86 less the bond of $2800.00 = $2322.86 now owing.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

7. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. .

8. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.

9. The inspection photographs speak for themselves, they show little if any attempt had been made to clean the property. I am satisfied that the cleaning that the landlord had completed at the property was needed to bring the property up to a reasonably clean and tidy standard. I am satisfied that the carpets needed cleaning to remove stains and the odour of a dog that the tenants were keeping at the property.

10. The tenants left a large bag outside the property full of rubbish, as the large orange bag was overloaded it could not be removed for the usual cost. The landlord had to pay someone to remove the rubbish and also general rubbish which had been left in the recycling bin.

11. The tenants did not return the master door key and one of the garage door remotes which meant that the remaining garage door remote had to be reprogrammes and the master door keys replaced.

12. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 3

13. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

14. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

15. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

16. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

17. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

18. The following damage was caused during the tenancy:

a. considerable scratch marks around the door jambs, sills and joinery of the house causing by a dog’s claw marks. The tenants say that the dog did not live at the property but was visiting. Nevertheless, the tenants are responsible for the damage caused by dogs that visit the property with the tenant’s permission.

b. Screw holes in the walls.

c. Scrap marks in the walls.

d. Areas where the tenant had tried to remedy holes and scrape marks which were poorly repaired, and the paint work did not match the paint colour on the walls.

e. A hole in one of the wooden floorboards in the lounge.

19. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

20. Whilst I am satisfied that the tenants caused this damage, I am not satisfied that the landlord should be compensated for the amounts that the landlord has

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 4

sought. This is because the landlord has not actually attended to the repair work and has only supplied quotes for the work.

21. I am not satisfied that the costs claimed by the landlord are reasonable for repair work, and therefore I have reduced the amount awarded. I also note that some of the areas that the landlord claimed required plastering and painting would be considered fair wear and tear caused by any family living in a property for 3 years.

22. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

Filing fee

23. [COMPANY] As Agent For [NAME] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee.

[NAME]

24 February 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 5

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 4966474 6

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord proved the amount of rent and water rates owed at the end of the tenancy with records and invoices.
  • The tenants did not leave the property reasonably clean and tidy or remove all rubbish.
  • Inspection photographs showed little attempt to clean the property, satisfying the tribunal that cleaning was needed.
  • The tenants did not return the master door key and one garage remote, requiring replacements and reprogramming.
  • The tenants are responsible for damage caused by visiting dogs, such as scratch marks around door frames.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The costs claimed by the landlord for repair work were not considered reasonable by the tribunal.
  • Some areas claimed for plastering and painting were considered fair wear and tear for a family living in a property for three years.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, water rates, cleaning fees, and damages for repairs.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the tenant's failure to pay rent arrears, water rates, and cleaning fees, and leaving the property in poor condition requiring repairs.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant must pay the specified amounts because they breached their obligations under the tenancy agreement by failing to pay rent and leaving the property unclean.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenant breached their obligations under the tenancy agreement by failing to pay rent and leaving the property unclean.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with their obligations under the tenancy agreement to avoid similar penalties.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included rent records, water rates invoices, entry and exit inspection reports, and photographs of the property condition.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant ordered to pay rent arrears and damages | VadeLab