VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages for Leaving Property Unclean

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the premises unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear. The Tribunal found that the tenant had not cleaned the property properly and had caused damage to the walls.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for rent arrears and damages if they leave the premises unclean and cause damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Topics

rent arrearsproperty damage

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section states that a tenant must pay rent on time, keep the property reasonably clean and tidy, and notify the landlord of any damage or needed repairs. When moving out, the tenant must leave the property in a reasonably clean and tidy condition and remove all rubbish.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the premises unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the premises unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear. The Tribunal found that the tenant had not complied with their obligations at the end of the tenancy and had caused damage to the premises.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5064988 1

[2025] NZTT 5064988

TENANCY TRIBUNAL - Video Location

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/[ADDRESS], Palmerston North, roslyn 4414

ORDER

1. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] $1,901.57 immediately, being rent arrears to 20 September 2024.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $953.57 Cleaning: rubbish removal and wall repairs $948.00 Total award $1,901.57 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,901.57

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the hearing by video. The Tenant did not attend by video or answer the telephone calls made by the Tribunal.

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears and compensation.

How much is owed for rent?

3. The tenancy ended on 20 September 2024 The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5064988 2

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.

5. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish. The Landlord provided photographs of the outgoing inspection report and an invoice for the costs. It appeared as if the Tenant did not do any cleaning and left a considerable amount of rubbish, food and broken furniture all over the property.

6. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

7. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

8. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.

9. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

10. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

11. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

12. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5064988 3

person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

13. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: Two wall holes. The Landlord speculated these were intentional holes probably caused by the Tenant punching the walls. Photographs were provided of the damage and an ingoing inspection report that did not show any damage to the walls. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

14. The amounts ordered are proved.

[NAME]

11 February 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5064988 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5064988 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord proved the amount of rent owing at the end of the tenancy by providing rent records.
  • The tenant failed to leave the premises clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
  • The landlord provided photographs and an invoice to prove the costs for cleaning and rubbish removal.
  • The landlord showed that two wall holes were caused during the tenancy and were more than fair wear and tear.
  • The tenant did not disprove their liability for the damage to the walls.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the premises unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the tenant's failure to pay rent arrears and to leave the premises clean and undamaged at the end of the tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant must pay the landlord for rent arrears and damages because the tenant did not leave the premises clean and caused damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

What was the argument that mattered most?

The most important argument was that the tenant failed to leave the premises clean and caused damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they leave the premises clean and do not cause unnecessary damage at the end of their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the outgoing inspection report and an invoice for the costs were provided by the landlord.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.