Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Filing Fee
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay rent arrears and the landlord's filing fee. The landlord's claim for damages was dismissed because he did not provide enough evidence.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have rent arrears calculated and deducted from a bond, and to have filing fees reimbursed if the landlord's application for damages is dismissed.
📖 What the law says
This rule states that a tenant must pay rent on time as agreed in their tenancy agreement. It also outlines other responsibilities, such as keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and notifying the landlord of any damage or needed repairs.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and filing fee reimbursement, dismissing the landlord's claim for damages.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and filing fee reimbursement to the landlord. The landlord's claim for damages was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120923 1
[2025] NZTT 5120923
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT WAITAKERE | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI WAITĀKERE
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. This order is reissued on 16 April 2025 to clarify that the landlord’s application seeking compensation for damage is withdrawn without prejudice to any future claim. This order replaces the order issued on 8 April 2025.
2. [NAME] must pay [NAME] $777.00 immediately calculated as shown in the table below:
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 22/01/25 less bond held by landlord $750.00 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $777.00
Reasons:
1. The landlord attended the hearing. The tenant did not attend.
2. Following the fixed-term tenancy coming to an agreed early end, the landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation for damage, and reimbursement of the filing fee.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120923 2
How much is owed for rent?
3. The tenancy was a fixed-term tenancy commencing 17 March 2024 and ending 16 March 2025.
4. The landlord says that in December 2024, the tenant approached the landlord and requested the fixed-term tenancy come to an early end at the end of the January 2025.
5. The landlord says they agreed the fixed-term tenancy could come to an end on 31 January 2025.
6. The tenant last paid rent on 10 December 2024.
7. The tenant moved out on 17 January 2025.
8. The landlord seeks rent arrears from 17 December 2024 to 22 January 2025, being a total of $5,500.00.
9. The landlord says he is holding a bond of $4,750.00 which the tenant paid him at the start of the tenancy. The bond was not lodged with the [COMPANY].
10. The landlord has applied that bond to the rent arrears owing, and seeks an order for the outstanding amount, being $750.00.
11. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy. I make an order accordingly.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
12. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).
13. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's [NAME], the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the [NAME] excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
14. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's [NAME], the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where [NAME] money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
15. The landlord seeks compensation for damage to windows, a sliding door, carpet, walls and a burned benchtop in the kitchen. The landlord has not filed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120923 3
an entry report showing the condition of those items at the start of the tenancy, or an exit report showing their condition at the end of the tenancy. The landlord has not filed evidence in support of the amounts claimed as costs incurred. The landlord has not filed evidence as to whether an [NAME] claim has been made, and if so, whether it has been accepted.
16. The applicant is required to establish the claim to the civil law standard of proof, on the balance of probabilities.
17. The applicant has not filed sufficient evidence in support of the claim for damages. The applicant has indicated he has the evidence necessary to support the claims and may file a future application.
18. I have not considered the merits of the landlord’s claim(s) for compensation for damage.
19. The landlord’s claim for compensation for damage is withdrawn without prejudice to any future application that may be made.
Should the tenant reimburse the landlord’s application fee?
20. As the landlord has substantially succeeded with their application (the claim for rent arrears being the largest of the two claims before applying the bond) the tenant must reimburse the filing fee.
[NAME]
16 April 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120923 4
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120923 5
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord proved the amount of rent owed at the end of the tenancy with rent records.
- The landlord was holding a bond which was applied to the rent arrears.
- The landlord substantially succeeded with their application for rent arrears.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord did not provide evidence to support the costs claimed for damages.
- The landlord did not provide evidence about an insurance claim for damages.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and the landlord's filing fee, while the landlord's claim for damages was dismissed.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was over unpaid rent arrears and the landlord's claim for damages to the rental property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant must pay the rent arrears and the filing fee because the landlord provided sufficient evidence. The claim for damages was dismissed due to lack of evidence.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 40(2)(a), 41, and 49B were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The most important argument was the landlord's provision of evidence for the rent arrears and the filing fee, while the claim for damages lacked supporting evidence.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, as the tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and the filing fee.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have sufficient evidence to support their claims, especially for damages.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The rent records and the landlord's evidence for the filing fee mattered. The landlord's claim for damages lacked supporting evidence.
