Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears via Tenancy Bond - Tenancy Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay rent arrears through the use of the tenancy bond. This decision was made as the tenant did not attend the hearing and could not be contacted.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is required to pay rent to the landlord according to the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the bond to be paid to the landlord for unpaid rent.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the bond to be paid to the landlord for unpaid rent up to 31 October 2024, as the tenant failed to attend the hearing and could not be reached.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120809 1
[2025] NZTT 5120809
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME] to pay [NAME] and [NAME] $1,200.00 from the bond for rent owing to 31 October 2024.
2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,200.00 (6128591-010) to [NAME] and [NAME] immediately.
Reasons:
1. Mr [NAME] attended the hearing for the landlords. The tenant was phoned on the number provided but the calls went to voicemail.
2. The landlords claim payment of the bond as compensation for rent owing at the end of the tenancy (31 October 2024).
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120809 2
3. The landlords have established the tenant owes rent to 31 October 2024 and that amount exceeds the bond.
[NAME]
17 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120809 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5120809 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlords established that the tenant owes rent up to 31 October 2024.
- The amount of rent owed exceeds the bond amount.
- The bond is to be paid immediately to the landlords.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not attend the hearing in person.
- The tenant did not respond to the calls made during the hearing.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision ordered the bond to be paid to the landlord for unpaid rent up to 31 October 2024.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenant's failure to pay rent arrears, which exceeded the amount in the tenancy bond.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the bond should be used to pay the landlord for the rent arrears because the tenant did not attend the hearing and could not be reached.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the tenant had not attended the hearing and could not be reached, thus failing to provide evidence or arguments against the claim.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, it means that if they fail to attend a hearing and cannot be reached, the court may rule in favour of the landlord and use the tenancy bond to cover unpaid rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify any particular evidence or documents that mattered.