Tenant Ordered to Refrain from Altering Security and Fire Systems
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must get the landlord's permission before making changes to the unit's security and fire safety systems. This includes installing new locks or altering the fire alarms and smoke detectors.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant must obtain the landlord's express permission before making alterations to the unit's security and fire safety systems.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal ordered the tenant to refrain from certain actions regarding the unit's security and fire safety systems.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to refrain from installing additional door locks, making alterations to the front door, interfering with the fire control system, or installing additional fire security systems without the landlord's express permission.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 9057984 1
[2025] NZTT 9057984
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT AUCKLAND | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU
APPLICANT: [redacted] [NAME]
RESPONDENT: [redacted] Owner of a principal unit
UNIT ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], Volt
ORDER
[NAME] must refrain from:
a. installing any additional door lock on the door of unit 1112 without the express permission of the [NAME];
b. interfering with or making any alterations to the unit’s front door without the express permission of the [NAME];
c. interfering with or removing the [NAME] fire control system in unit 1112, including but not limited to fire alarms and smoke detectors; and
d. installing any additional fire security system in unit 1112 that may interfere with the existing fire security system, without the express permission of the [NAME].
Reasons:
1. [NAME] appeared for the [NAME].
2. [NAME] attended by telephone.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 9057984 2
3. I heard this application today together with another application by the [NAME] against [NAME], file number 9047264.
4. In that other application, [NAME] accepted liability for [NAME]’s on- charges for five callouts by [COMPANY] related to [NAME]’s unit’s smoke alarm.
5. The [NAME] is also concerned that [NAME] installed a new front door lock without the [NAME]’s approval.
Should the Tribunal make orders against [NAME] to refrain?
6. The [NAME] originally applied for orders to access to [NAME]’s unit to reinstall the fire security system and replace an unapproved door lock. However, [NAME] assured the Tribunal those orders are no longer required.
7. [NAME] does not oppose the prospective order-to-refrain made above. The matters [NAME] must refrain more are no more than a restatement of [NAME]’s obligations under the Unit Titles Act 2010 and the [NAME] operational rules.
8. The Tribunal makes the orders sought.1
Costs
9. [NAME] says the [NAME] will seek costs.
10. The [NAME]’s costs submissions must be filed by 5:00pm on Friday 28 March 2025.
11. [NAME] is not required to file costs submissions at this time. The Tribunal will invite him to file costs submissions if it later determines that is desirable.
R Kee 14 March 2025
1 Under s 171(3A)(b).
__________________________________________________________________________________ 9057984 3
Please read carefully:
SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ANY HELP OR INFORMATION REGARDING THIS [COMPANY] [PHONE].
MEHEMA HE PĀTAI TĀU E PĀ ANA KI TENEI TAKE, PĀTAI ATU KI TE [COMPANY] [PHONE].
AFAI E TE MANA’OMIA SE FESOASOANI E UIGA I LENEI MATAUPU FA’AMOLEMOLE IA FA’AFESO’OTAI’I LOA LE OFISA O LE [COMPANY] [PHONE].
Rehearings:
You may make an application to the Tenancy Tribunal for a rehearing. Such an application must be made within five working days of the order and must be lodged at the Court where the dispute was heard.
The only ground for a rehearing of an application is that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has or may have occurred or is likely to occur. Being unhappy or dissatisfied with the decision is not a ground for a rehearing. (See ‘Right of Appeal’ below).
Right of Appeal:
If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the Tenancy Tribunal, you may appeal to the District Court. You only have 10 working days after the date of the decision to lodge a notice of appeal.
However, you may not appeal to the District Court:
1. Against an interim order made by the Tribunal. 2. Against an order, or the failure to make an order, for the payment of money where the
amount that would be in dispute on appeal is less than $1,000. 3. Against a work order, or the failure to make a work order, where the value of the work
that would be in dispute on appeal is less than $1,000.
There is a $200.00 filing fee payable at the time of filing the appeal.
Enforcement:
Where the Tribunal made an order that needs to be enforced then the party seeking enforcement should contact the Collections Office of the District Court on [PHONE] or go to www.justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc:
Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
http://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant accepted responsibility for charges related to the unit's smoke alarm.
- The tenant did not object to the orders to refrain from making alterations.
- The orders to refrain are a restatement of the tenant's existing obligations under the Unit Titles Act 2010 and the operational rules.
- The tribunal decided to make the orders sought by the applicant.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to refrain from making changes to the unit's security and fire safety systems without the landlord's permission.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenant's unauthorised installation of a new front door lock and interference with the fire control system.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant must obtain the landlord's express permission before making any alterations to the unit's security and fire safety systems to ensure compliance with the Unit Titles Act 2010 and the operational rules.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were cited in the judgment.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need to maintain proper security and fire safety standards as per the Unit Titles Act 2010 and the operational rules.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should always obtain the landlord's permission before making any changes to the unit's security and fire safety systems.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.
