Tenant's Claim Dismissed for Not Attending Hearing
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a tenant's claim because the tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing and could not provide evidence to support their claim. As a result, the bond was returned to the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant's claim is dismissed if they fail to attend the hearing and provide evidence.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant failed to attend the hearing and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the claim and return of the bond to the respondent.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a tenant's claim after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing and provide evidence supporting their claim. The bond was returned to the tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5449831 1
[2026] NZTT 5449831
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], Half Moon Bay, Auckland 2012
ORDER
1. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $517.50 (5874182-003) to [NAME] immediately.
2. The application is dismissed.
Reasons:
1. This application was scheduled to be heard by video conference. The applicant did not connect to the Teams link and did not ring in to the hearing as directed in the Notice of Hearing sent to them. Further to this I made 5 calls to 2 telephone numbers that the applicant provided. All calls went unanswered.
2. The applicant has therefore not been able to prove their claim and so it is dismissed.
3. Given that the applicant has not proven the claim, the bond is returned to the respondent.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5449831 2
4. I note that the respondent attended the hearing by telephone.
[NAME]
17 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5449831 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5449831 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The respondent attended the hearing by telephone.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The applicant did not connect to the Teams link.
- The applicant did not ring in to the hearing as directed.
- The applicant did not answer 5 calls made to the provided telephone numbers.
- The applicant failed to provide evidence to prove their claim.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant's claim was dismissed because they did not attend the scheduled hearing and could not provide evidence to support their claim.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about a tenant's claim against the landlord, which required attending a scheduled hearing and providing evidence.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to dismiss the claim because the tenant did not attend the hearing and could not provide evidence to support their claim.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The most important argument was the tenant's failure to attend the hearing and provide evidence.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they attend the scheduled hearing and provide all necessary evidence to support their claim.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify any particular evidence or documents that mattered.