Tenant Wins Bond Release Despite Not Moving In
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant was entitled to the release of their bond, even though the tenant did not move into the property. The Tribunal decided that the tenant's name was on the bond form, making them eligible for the bond release.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to the return of their bond when the tenancy ends, regardless of whether they moved in or not.
📖 What the law says
This rule explains how the Tenancy Tribunal should handle disputes. It says the Tribunal should resolve issues fairly and quickly, focusing on the overall merits and justice of the case rather than strict legal rules or technicalities.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal ordered the agent to release the bond to the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the agent to release the bond to the tenant, despite the tenant not having moved into the property. The Tribunal ruled that the tenant's name was on the bond form, making them entitled to the bond release.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5118748 1
[2025] NZTT 5118748
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT PALMERSTON NORTH | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI TE PAPAIOEA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Tenant
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Landlord
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. Subject to order 2, the [COMPANY] is to pay the bond of $2,280.00 (5252218- 005) to [NAME] immediately.
2. If [COMPANY] hold the bond money they must pay it to [NAME] immediately.
3. [COMPANY] must pay the filing fee of $27.00 to [NAME] immediately.
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing.
2. The tenant has applied for release of the bond for the tenancy which ended on 18 November 2024.
3. Although the bond records available to the Tribunal show that the bond is sitting with the [COMPANY], the landlord says that they have the bond funds. The landlord has not released the bond to the tenant because the bond was paid by WINZ, and so they seek an order from the Tribunal.
4. In fact the tenant did not ever move in. The landlord released the tenant from her obligations and did not seek any rent.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5118748 2
5. The sum of $2,280 was presumably a loan from WINZ for the purpose of enabling the tenant to move into a house that she has not moved into. On that basis, it seems that morally, the tenant has no right to the bond.
6. However, it is the tenant’s name on the tenancy and bond form. WINZ is not a party to the tenancy. The situation is the same as if a friend or relative of the tenant had paid the bond for her.
7. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to order payment to anyone other than the parties.
8. Section 85 of the Residential Tenancies Act provides that the Tribunal shall determine each dispute according to the general principles of the law relating to the matter and the substantial merits and justice of the case, but shall not be bound to give effect to strict legal rights or obligations or to legal forms or technicalities. However, that does not mean that Tribunal’s jurisdiction can be extended to order payment to non-parties. If the tenant owes the money to WINZ, that is a matter between the tenant and WINZ.
9. The tenant may decide that the right thing to do is to repay the money to WINZ.
10. [NAME] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
T Baker
26 February 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5118748 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5118748 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant's name was on the tenancy and bond form, making them the rightful claimant for the bond.
- The Tribunal's jurisdiction does not extend to ordering payment to non-parties like WINZ.
- The tenant succeeded entirely with her claim, entitling her to reimbursement of the filing fee.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's argument that the bond should not be released to the tenant because WINZ paid it was rejected.
- The landlord's argument that the tenant had no moral right to the bond because she never moved in was rejected.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the agent to release the bond to the tenant.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the tenant was entitled to the bond release despite not moving into the property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant was entitled to the bond release because the tenant's name was on the bond form.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 85 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the tenant's name was on the bond form, making them entitled to the bond release.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be entitled to the release of their bond if their name is on the bond form, regardless of whether they moved into the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence that mattered was the bond form with the tenant's name on it.