VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Wins Full Bond Refund Due to Lack of Counterclaim

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ruled in favour of a tenant who requested a full bond refund. The landlord failed to file a counterclaim as required by law and did not attend the hearing, leading to the tenant's success.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a full bond refund when the landlord fails to file a counterclaim as required by law.

Topics

bond refundcounterclaim requirements

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 22B(2)

📖 Technical summary

Tenant's bond refund claim successful due to landlord's failure to file a counterclaim.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal awarded a tenant a full bond refund after the landlord failed to file a counterclaim as required by law. The landlord did not attend the hearing and could not provide evidence of filing a counterclaim or paying a filing fee.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480255 1

[2026] NZTT 5480255

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Tenant

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Landlord

TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/Flat [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant name and identifying details.

Description Landlord Tenant Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $28.00 Bond $2,600.00 Total payable by Landlord to Tenant $28.00

Reasons:

1. The tenant attended the hearing held on 5 June 2026 by video. The landlord did not attend the hearing.

2. After the tenant left the hearing, the landlord joined by video. He said that there had been a technical issue, and he was not being let into the hearing. An attempt was made to call the tenants to rejoin the hearing, but the calls were not answered.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480255 2

3. The tenant has applied for refund of the bond. The landlord has a claim against the bond, but has not filed a counterclaim with Tenancy Services.

4. Section 22B(2) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that, where a tenant applies for refund of the bond, and the landlord seeks payment from the bond, the landlord must file an application setting out the details of the counterclaim. Because the landlord has not filed a counterclaim the bond is refunded in full to the tenant.

5. The landlord said that he had filed a cross application but was unable to refer to an application number or a date that the application was filed. He could not produce evidence of payment of a filing fee.

6. Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. For the same reason the tenant’s name is suppressed.

N Walker 05 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480255 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480255 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal decided to award the tenant a full bond refund.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the landlord had properly filed a counterclaim to contest the bond refund.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the tenant because the landlord failed to file a counterclaim as required by law.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 22B(2) was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The most important argument was that the landlord did not file a counterclaim as required by law.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their landlord files a proper counterclaim if they wish to contest a bond refund.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify any particular evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.