Tenant's Late Rehearing Application Dismissed in Auckland
📌 In brief
A tenant applied late for a rehearing at the Tenancy Tribunal but was denied because they did not attend the hearing or provide sufficient reasons for their delay. This case highlights the importance of adhering to strict timelines and attending hearings as required by law.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is not entitled to a rehearing if they fail to attend the hearing or provide sufficient grounds for delay.
📖 What the law says
This section allows the Tenancy Tribunal to order a rehearing if a significant mistake or unfair outcome has happened or might happen. A request for a rehearing must be submitted within 5 working days of the decision, though the Tribunal can sometimes allow more time.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed an out-of-time application for rehearing due to non-attendance and lack of evidence.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a tenant's out-of-time application for rehearing due to non-attendance and lack of evidence supporting the need for an extension. The decision emphasises adherence to procedural requirements under the Residential Tenancies Act.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4954213 1
[2026] NZTT 4954213
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [Tenancy address suppressed]
ORDER
1. The Tribunal orders suppression of the landlord’s name and identifying details.
2. The application for a rehearing is dismissed.
Reasons:
1. The landlord attended the hearing.
2. The tenants did not connect to the MS Teams link provided to them and nor did they connect via telephone as instructed in the Notice of Hearing sent to them. The hearing commenced at 9.30 am and I waited until 9.54 am for the tenant. The hearing proceeded in their absence.
3. On 9 September 2024 the Tribunal made an order for rent arrears, water rates and a conditional termination order. The tenant did not attend the hearing in respect of that order.
4. On 15 April 2026 the tenant filed:
a. an application for rehearing out of time
b. an application for a rehearing, and
c. applied for a stay of proceedings, being a tick box on the application form.
5. The tenant said in her application for a rehearing that she would like a decision to be made as to whether a rehearing could be granted without another hearing if I considered that appropriate. I considered that a hearing was
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4954213 2
required, and I directed a further hearing be scheduled and I declined to grant a stay.
6. The relevant law is found in the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA). Section 105 (1) RTA says the Tribunal shall in all proceedings have the power to order a rehearing of the whole or any part of the proceedings on the ground that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has or may have occurred or is likely to occur. Section 105(2) RTA provides that applications for rehearing must be filed within 5 working days of the date of the order. The purpose of this time limit is to ensure finality of Tenancy Tribunal orders and certainty of the position from the point of view of both parties. Section 105(2) RTA also allows the Tribunal to give further time for the filing of an application for a rehearing. This recognises the rare situation where there may be good grounds for a rehearing application being filed late. The Tribunal will usually consider the following factors:
a. Length of the delay.
b. Reason for the delay.
c. Merits of the application.
d. Whether allowing the application will unfairly prejudice the other party.
e. The overall interests of justice.
7. The tenant has not attended the hearing to address the matters above nor did she request an adjournment. I acknowledge the landlord is not opposed to the application for name suppression for the tenant, however I consider the tenant is required to address the relevant factors set out above, at a hearing, and I am not satisfied I have sufficient information on the documentary evidence provided alone to determine the matter. I am therefore not satisfied that a rehearing should be granted out of time and the application is dismissed. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) RTA.
8. The landlord sought name suppression and because I have previously ordered suppression for the landlord in these proceedings that order continues to apply. See s 95A RTA.
[NAME] 29 May 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4954213 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 4954213 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Allows Landlord to Dispose of Tenant's Abandoned Goods in Christch…
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Owing $2,873 in Rent Arrears Gets Conditional Termination Order in A…
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Terminates Tenant's Tenancy in Christchurch Due to Abandonment and…
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant ordered to pay $2,890 in rent arrears in Christchurch
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Terminates Tenancy Due to Rent Arrears in Kaihoke
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Decision — [2026] NZTT 5515554
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Terminates Tenancy for Rent Arrears Over £4,763 Owed
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay $4,109.14 for Rent Arrears in Auckland
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Rehearing Application Dismissed in Auckland
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Rejects Claims for Cleaning and Damages in Tenancy Dispute
- Tenancy Tribunal Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Expedited Abandonment Application Due to Lack o…
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Claim Dismissed for Lack of Evidence in Auckland
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant failed to attend the hearing or provide sufficient grounds for delay.
- A rehearing is not granted merely by alleging errors of law or fact without showing a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for a rehearing.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenant's application for a rehearing of a previous decision regarding rent arrears and termination.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to dismiss the application because the tenant did not attend the hearing and provide necessary information as instructed.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 105 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the tenant's failure to attend the hearing and provide necessary information.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they attend the hearing and provide all necessary information.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify any particular evidence or documents that mattered.
