Tenants Must Pay Rent Arrears and Joint Liability for Bills
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenants to pay rent arrears and joint liability for bills, highlighting the joint responsibility under the Tenancy Agreement.
⚖️ Legal holding
Tenants are jointly and severally liable for rent arrears under the Tenancy Agreement.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered tenants to pay rent arrears and joint liability for bills.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenants to pay rent arrears and joint liability for bills, emphasising the joint responsibility under the Tenancy Agreement.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5197111 1
[2025] NZTT 5197111
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT MANUKAU | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI MANUKAU
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [NAME], and [NAME] (the Tenants) must pay [COMPANY] (the Landlord) the sum of $6,551.54, representing rent arrears $6,524.54 as at 6 June 2025, and filing fee of $27.00.
2. The Tenants must pay the total amount of $6,551.54 in four instalments of $1,637.89 each, with payments to commence on 13 June 2025 and continue weekly thereafter. These payments are in addition to the usual weekly rent of $795.00.
3. Tenant [NAME] consents to pay the outstanding [NAME] bill of $779.00 by 11:59pm, 6 June 2025 on behalf of all the Tenants.
Reasons:
1. All parties were properly served with a Notice of Hearing. The Landlord’s directors attended the Hearing; however, only [NAME] and his 20- year-old son, [NAME], appeared from the six named Tenants. It is understood that another named tenant, [NAME], has resided in
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5197111 2
Australia since 23 February 2025; nevertheless, she was also properly served but did not attend the Hearing or communicate with the Registry beforehand.
2. The Landlord applied for rent arrears and provided rent records, which substantiate the amount owed. This amount is not disputed.
3. The Landlord accepted the explanation given by the attending tenants, [NAME] and [NAME], that the other tenants have not been paying their share or forwarding their full contributions, and that they would follow up with them. However, it was explained to and understood by all present that the Tenants are jointly and severally liable under the Tenancy Agreement.
4. For these reasons and given that all Tenants were properly served with the Notice of Hearing yet failed to attend, the application by [NAME] near the end of the Hearing for an adjournment to allow the other tenants to attend was declined.
5. While the Landlord initially sought immediate payment of the rental arrears, considering the otherwise excellent tenancy and the pending termination under a 90-day notice, the Landlord agreed to accept payment in four instalments, which the Tribunal orders accordingly.
6. The Landlord raised several questions regarding enforcement and potential issues relating to the upcoming end of the tenancy. The Tribunal recommends that the parties seek appropriate advice, including from publicly available resources as advised during the Hearing.
7. The Tribunal acknowledges and thanks the parties who attended today’s Hearing for their considered and respectful conduct and further recognises the difficulties they are facing in this matter.
[NAME]
09 June 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5197111 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit [NAME]/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.[NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5197111 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord provided rent records that confirmed the amount of rent owed.
- The amount of rent arrears claimed by the landlord was not disputed by the tenants who attended the hearing.
- All tenants were properly notified about the hearing.
- The tenants are all responsible for the rent arrears because the tenancy agreement makes them jointly and severally liable.
- The landlord agreed to accept payment of the arrears in four instalments, despite initially seeking immediate payment.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The request for a delay to allow other tenants to attend the hearing was denied.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenants to pay rent arrears and joint liability for bills.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenants failing to pay their share of rent arrears and joint liability for bills.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenants must pay the rent arrears and joint liability for bills because they are jointly and severally liable under the Tenancy Agreement.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 54 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the joint and several liability of the tenants under the Tenancy Agreement.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they understand their joint liability under the Tenancy Agreement.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The rent records and the Tenancy Agreement were the key pieces of evidence.
