Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Expedited Abandonment Process Application
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal rejected the landlord's request to terminate the tenancy through an expedited process because the landlord did not provide enough information to make a decision without a full hearing.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord's application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted if the information provided is insufficient to determine the case without a hearing.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal denied the expedited abandonment process application due to insufficient information provided by the landlord.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal denied the landlord's application for termination under the expedited abandonment process due to insufficient information provided, referring the application to Tenancy Services for a full hearing.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5170152 1
[2025] NZTT 5170152
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/Flat [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], Kotukutuku
ORDER
1. The application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted.
2. The application is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing to be scheduled.
Reasons:
1. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for abandonment through the expedited process under section 91AA Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Are there grounds for an expedited application?
2. The two requirements for the expedited process are:
a. The tenant does not want to contest the abandonment application.
b. The information provided by the landlord with the application is sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing (either on the basis of the information alone or with only minor clarifications).
3. If the requirements for the expedited process are met, the Tribunal may terminate the tenancy where the premises have been abandoned and rent is in arrear at
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5170152 2
the hearing date. See section 61 Residential Tenancies Act 1986. A tenancy is abandoned where the tenant leaves the premises without reasonable excuse, not intending to return or to meet their obligations, and fails to notify the landlord.
4. I am not satisfied that both conditions for the expedited process are met. The information provided by the landlord with this application is not sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing.
5. The applicant has not provided a full rent record from the start of the tenancy. This is required to establish that the tenant is in rent arrears.
6. The application recorded that the tenancy began on 12 December 2022.The tenancy agreement also records that this is the start date of the tenancy.
7. The provided ‘Summary Of Rent From The Start Of The Tenancy to 21/02/2025’ records rental payments starting from 1 January 2024, not from 12 December 2024.
8. The application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted and the application is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing to be scheduled.
[NAME]
10 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5170152 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5170152 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord did not provide a complete rent record from the start of the tenancy.
- The summary of rent payments started from January 2024, missing crucial earlier data.
- The information provided was insufficient to confirm whether the tenant was in rent arrears.
- The landlord did not demonstrate that the tenant left the premises without reasonable excuse.
- The landlord failed to show that the tenant did not intend to return or meet their obligations.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not contest the abandonment application.
- The landlord applied for termination under the expedited abandonment process.
- The tenancy began on December 12, 2022, according to the agreement.
- The application included a summary of rent payments from the start of the tenancy to February 21, 2025.
- The landlord claimed the premises were abandoned and rent was in arrears at the time of the application.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal denied the landlord's application for termination under the expedited abandonment process.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the landlord could use the expedited abandonment process to terminate the tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to deny the application because the landlord did not provide sufficient information to determine the case without a hearing.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 91AA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the landlord did not provide a full rent record from the start of the tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they provide all necessary information to avoid having their application denied.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence that mattered was the lack of a full rent record from the start of the tenancy.