Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Expedited Abandonment Request
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal denied the landlord's request to terminate the tenancy through an expedited process because the landlord did not provide enough evidence to prove the tenant abandoned the property and owed rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord cannot obtain an expedited abandonment order without providing sufficient evidence and meeting all statutory requirements.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal denied the landlord's expedited abandonment application and referred it for a full hearing.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal denied the landlord's application for termination under the expedited abandonment process due to insufficient evidence and referred the case to Tenancy Services for a full hearing.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5203132 1
[2025] NZTT 5203132
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted] Kopa, [NAME]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. The application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted.
2. The application is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing to be scheduled.
Reasons:
1. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for abandonment through the expedited process under section 91AA Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Are there grounds for an expedited application?
2. The two requirements for the expedited process are:
a. The tenant does not want to contest the abandonment application.
b. The information provided by the landlord with the application is sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing (either on the basis of the information alone or with only minor clarifications).
3. If the requirements for the expedited process are met, the Tribunal may terminate the tenancy where the premises have been abandoned and rent is in arrear at the hearing date. See section 61 Residential Tenancies Act 1986. A tenancy is
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5203132 2
abandoned where the tenant leaves the premises without reasonable excuse, not intending to return or to meet their obligations, and fails to notify the landlord.
4. I am not satisfied that both conditions for the expedited process are met. The information provided by the landlord with this application is not sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing.
5. An applicant is required to establish that the rent is in arrears at the hearing date. The information provided requires clarification.
• On the tenancy application form , the date the tenancy started is recorded as 19 July 2016.
• On the tenancy agreement, the start date is written as 8 February 2023.
• The rent summary sheet provided called ‘summary from the start of the tenancy’ records the first rent due date as 10 September 2022.
6. There was not enough evidence provided to establish that the rent was in arrears.
7. The application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted and the application is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing to be scheduled.
T Harris
24 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5203132 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5203132 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord did not provide sufficient evidence to meet the statutory requirements for an expedited abandonment order.
- The dates provided for the start of the tenancy were inconsistent, making it unclear whether rent was in arrears.
- The information given by the landlord required clarification, indicating insufficient evidence for an expedited determination.
- The landlord failed to establish that the rent was in arrears at the hearing date.
- The landlord did not provide evidence that the tenant left the premises without reasonable excuse and not intending to return.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord attempted to use the expedited abandonment process to terminate the tenancy.
- The landlord claimed that the tenant did not want to contest the abandonment application.
- The landlord requested termination based on abandonment without providing adequate supporting documentation.
- The landlord did not address the inconsistencies in the dates provided for the start of the tenancy.
- The landlord did not clarify the discrepancies in the rent due dates and the start date of the tenancy.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal denied the landlord's request to terminate the tenancy through an expedited process.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the landlord could terminate the tenancy quickly because the tenant allegedly abandoned the property and owed rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided against the landlord because they did not provide sufficient evidence to prove the tenant abandoned the property and owed rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, specifically section 91AA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was whether the landlord had provided enough evidence to meet the statutory requirements for an expedited abandonment process.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have strong evidence to support their claims before applying for an expedited abandonment process.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence that mattered included the tenancy application form, the tenancy agreement, and the rent summary sheet.