VadeLab
StatuteCompanies Act 1993

Section 386A — Companies Act 1993: Director of failed company must not be director, etc, of phoenix company with same or substantially similar name

Text of the provision Official document

386A Director of failed company must not be director, etc, of phoenix company with same or substantially similar name (1) Except with the permission of the Court, or unless 1 of the exceptions in sections 386D to 386F applies, a director of a failed company must not, for a period of 5 years after the date of commencement of the liquidation of the failed company,— (a) be a director of a phoenix company; or (b) directly or indirectly be concerned in or take part in the promotion, formation, or management of a phoenix company; or (c) directly or indirectly be concerned in or take part in the carrying on of a business that has the same name as the failed company's pre-liquidation name or a similar name. (2) A person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on conviction on indictment to the penalty set out in section 373(4) . Compare: Insolvency Act 1986 (UK) s 216 Section 386A: inserted, on 1 November 2007, by section 35 of the Companies Amendment Act 2006 (2006 No 56).

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.