VadeLab
StatuteEmployment Relations Act 2000

Section 112 — Employment Relations Act 2000: Choice of procedures

Text of the provision Official document

112 Choice of procedures (1) Where the circumstances giving rise to a personal grievance by an employee are also such that that employee would be entitled to make a complaint under the Human Rights Act 1993 , the employee may take 1, but not both, of the following steps: (a) the employee may, if the grievance is not otherwise resolved, apply to the Authority for the resolution of the grievance: (b) the employee may make, in relation to those circumstances, a complaint under the Human Rights Act 1993 . (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) , an employee makes a complaint when proceedings in relation to that complaint are commenced by the complainant or the Commission. (3) If an employee applies to the Authority for a resolution of the grievance under subsection (1)(a) , the employee may not exercise or continue to exercise any rights in relation to the subject matter of the grievance that the employee may have under the Human Rights Act 1993 . (4) If an employee makes a complaint under subsection (1)(b) , the employee may not exercise or continue to exercise any rights in relation to the subject matter of the complaint that the employee may have under this Act. Compare: 1991 No 22 s 39 Subsection (2) was substituted, as from 1 January 2002, by section 71 Human Rights Amendment Act 2001 (2001 No 96). Subsections (3) and (4) were inserted, as from 1 December 2004, by section 41 Employment Relations Amendment Act (No 2) 2004 (2004 No 86). See section 73 of that Act for the transitional provisions.

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.