VadeLab
StatuteIncome Tax Act 2007

Section DN 5 — Income Tax Act 2007: Foreign investment fund loss

Text of the provision Official document

DN 5 Foreign investment fund loss Deduction (1) A person is allowed a deduction for a FIF loss. Ring-fencing rule for loss calculated under attributable FIF income method (2) The deduction for a FIF loss calculated under the attributable FIF income method is subject to the jurisdictional ring-fencing rule in section DN 8 . Link with subpart DA (3) This section supplements the general permission and overrides the capital limitation. The other general limitations still apply. Defined in this Act: attributable FIF income method , calculation method , capital limitation , deduction , FIF loss , general limitation , general permission , supplement , Compare: 2004 No 35 s DN 5 Section DN 5(2) heading: amended (with effect on 1 July 2011 and applying for income years beginning on or after that date), on 7 May 2012, by section 14(1) of the Taxation (International Investment and Remedial Matters) Act 2012 (2012 No 34). Section DN 5(2): amended (with effect on 1 July 2011 and applying for income years beginning on or after that date), on 7 May 2012, by section 14(1) of the Taxation (International Investment and Remedial Matters) Act 2012 (2012 No 34). Section DN 5 list of defined terms attributable FIF income method : inserted (with effect on 1 July 2011), on 7 May 2012, by section 14(2)(b) of the Taxation (International Investment and Remedial Matters) Act 2012 (2012 No 34). Section DN 5 list of defined terms branch equivalent method : repealed (with effect on 1 July 2011), on 7 May 2012, by section 14(2)(a) of the Taxation (International Investment and Remedial Matters) Act 2012 (2012 No 34).

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.