Section DZ 20 — Income Tax Act 2007: Expenditure incurred while income-earning activity interrupted by Canterbury earthquake
Text of the provision Official document
DZ 20 Expenditure incurred while income-earning activity interrupted by Canterbury earthquake When this section applies (1) This section applies for a person and an income year (the current year ) before the 2016–17 income year when— (a) the person has an income-earning activity in greater Christchurch (as defined in section 4 of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011) immediately before a Canterbury earthquake (as defined in that section); and (b) the activity is interrupted for a period (the period of interruption ) as a result of the Canterbury earthquake; and (c) in the current year, during the period of interruption, the person incurs expenditure or loss (the interruption expenditure ) in meeting an obligation relating to the income-earning activity; and (d) the interruption expenditure does not meet the requirements of the general permission for the person and the income-earning activity but would do so but for the interruption; and (e) the person resumes the income-earning activity in an income year (the resumption year ) before the 2016–17 income year. Deduction for interruption expenditure (2) The person is allowed a deduction for the interruption expenditure. Timing of deduction (3) The deduction is allocated to the resumption year. Link with subpart DA (4) This section supplements the general permission; the general limitations still apply. Defined in this Act: deduction , , general limitation , , general permission , , income , , income year , , loss Section DZ 20: inserted (with effect on 4 September 2010), on 2 November 2012 (applying for the 2010–11 to the 2015–16 income years), by section 29(1) of the Taxation (Annual Rates, Returns Filing, and Remedial Matters) Act 2012 (2012 No 88).
Official source: legislation.govt.nz
Search case law on this topic
See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.
Explore case law →