VadeLab
StatuteProperty (Relationships) Act 1976

Section 76 — Property (Relationships) Act 1976: Effect on will or intestacy of choice of division under this Act

Text of the provision Official document

76 Effect on will or intestacy of choice of division under this Act (1) Unless the will (if any) of the deceased spouse or partner expresses a contrary intention,— (a) every gift to the surviving spouse or partner in the will of the deceased spouse or partner (if any) is to be treated (for all purposes) as having been revoked; and (b) the will of the deceased spouse or partner (if any) is to be interpreted as if the surviving spouse or partner had died before the deceased spouse or partner; and (c) the estate of the deceased spouse or partner must be distributed accordingly. (2) The reference in subsection (1)(a) to gifts to the surviving spouse or partner in the will of the deceased spouse or partner includes the whole of the interest of the surviving spouse or partner as a beneficiary in any real or personal property to which the surviving spouse or partner would otherwise be entitled under the will of the deceased spouse or partner. (3) The surviving spouse or partner has no entitlement under Part 3 of the Administration Act 1969 . (4) This section is subject to section 77 . Sections 55 to 57 were repealed, and new Part 8 (comprising sections 55 to 95) and Part 9 (comprising sections 96 to 99) were inserted, as from 1 February 2002, by section 61 Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001 (2001 No 5). See Part 9 of this Act as to the transitional and saving provisions. Section 76 was amended, as from 26 April 2005, by section 3(2) Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2005 (2005 No 19) by substituting the word “ partner ” for the words “ de facto partner ” wherever they appear.

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.