VadeLab
StatuteSenior Courts Act 2016

Section 170 — Senior Courts Act 2016: Reserved judgments

Text of the provision Official document

170 Reserved judgments (1) The Chief High Court Judge must, in consultation with the Chief Justice,— (a) publish information about the process by which parties to proceedings before the High Court may obtain information about the status of any reserved judgment in those proceedings; and (b) periodically publish information about the number of judgments of the court that he or she considers are outstanding beyond a reasonable time for delivery; and (c) publish any other information about reserved judgments that he or she considers is useful. (2) The President of the Court of Appeal must, in consultation with the Chief Justice,— (a) publish information about the process by which parties to proceedings before the Court of Appeal may obtain information about the status of any reserved judgment in those proceedings; and (b) periodically publish information about the number of judgments of the court that he or she considers is outstanding beyond a reasonable time for delivery; and (c) publish any other information about reserved judgments that he or she considers is useful. (3) The Chief Justice must— (a) publish information about the process by which parties to proceedings before the Supreme Court may obtain information about the status of any reserved judgment in those proceedings; and (b) periodically publish information about the number of judgments of the court that he or she considers are outstanding beyond a reasonable time for delivery; and (c) publish any other information about reserved judgments that he or she considers is useful.

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.