VadeLab
StatuteSentencing Act 2002

Section 33 — Sentencing Act 2002: Court may order reparation report

Text of the provision Official document

33 Court may order reparation report (1) If the court considers that a sentence of reparation may be appropriate, the court may order a probation officer, or any other person designated by the court for the purpose, to prepare a reparation report for the court in accordance with section 34 on all or any of the following matters: (a) in the case of loss of or damage to property, the value of that loss or damage and any consequential loss or damage: (b) in the case of emotional harm, the nature of that harm and the value of any consequential loss or damage: (c) in the case of any loss or damage consequential on physical harm,— (i) the nature and value of the loss or damage; and (ii) the extent to which the person who suffered the loss or damage is likely to be covered by entitlements under the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Act 2001 : (d) the financial capacity of the offender: (e) the maximum amount that the offender is likely to be able to pay under a sentence of reparation: (f) the frequency and magnitude of any payments that should be required under a sentence of reparation, if provision for payment by instalments is thought desirable. (2) The court may decline to seek a report under subsection (1) and impose a sentence of reparation without further inquiry if— (a) the court is satisfied as to the amount of reparation that the offender should pay; or (b) the type of information referred to in a reparation report is available through other means (including, without limitation, a declaration made following a direction under section 41 ); or (c) in all the circumstances the court considers that a report is unnecessary. (3) For the purposes of the preparation of a reparation report, a court may direct the offender to make a declaration as to his or her financial capacity in accordance with section 42 . Compare: 1985 No 120 s 22(3) Subsection (1) was amended, as from 7 July 2004, by section 4(1) Sentencing Amendment Act 2004 (2004 No 68) by substituting the words “ may be appropriate ” for the words “ should be imposed ” . Subsection (1)(b) was amended, as from 7 July 2004, by section 4(2)(a) Sentencing Amendment Act 2004 (2004 No 68) by inserting the words “ the value of ” after the word “ and ” . Subsection (1)(c)(i) was amended, as from 7 July 2004, by section 4(2)(b) Sentencing Amendment Act 2004 (2004 No 68) by inserting the words “ and value ” after the word “ nature ” .

Official source: legislation.govt.nz

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer.