
Benefits & Welfare judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a decision denying Personal Independence Payment (PIP) due to errors in interpreting the definition of 'take nutrition'. The case was remitted for a complete rehearing.
The Upper Tribunal rejected a worker's appeal regarding a late claim for national insurance credits. The court ruled that the claim was not made within a reasonable time frame after the period in question.
The Upper Tribunal confirmed that an asylum seeker can claim backdated Child Benefit if they make the claim within three months of receiving notification of their refugee status. This decision supports the First-tier Tribunal's ruling in favour of the claimant.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal brought by a claimant who was denied eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) by the First-tier Tribunal. The case was remitted to a new panel for reconsideration due to an error of law in the original decision.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal challenging the removal of a housing benefit disregard due to an error in interpreting childcare costs during the pandemic. The case was sent back to a different tribunal for reconsideration.
The Upper Tribunal ruled that the claimant was entitled to housing benefit because he had a sufficient right to reside and comprehensive sickness insurance. This decision was made in favour of the claimant who had lived in Wales since 1986.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed the claimant's appeal for a disablement pension, stating that he no longer suffered from any loss of faculty due to the accident. This decision was based on medical records and expert opinions provided during the appeal process.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a review decision of the Special Educational Needs Tribunal for Wales due to an error on a point of law. This decision establishes the right of appeal against such review decisions.
In a recent Upper Tribunal decision, the court ruled that the First-tier Tribunal retains its authority to hear cases even after a patient is conditionally discharged. This decision ensures ongoing judicial review in mental health cases.
The Upper Tribunal overturned a lower court's decision about a person's eligibility for a personal independence payment because the lower court made a mistake in applying the law. The case will now be heard again by a different panel of judges.