VadeLab

Benefits & Welfare

Benefits & Welfare judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·30 Sept 2019

Claimant's Appeal Allowed Due to Procedural Error

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Oct 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on ESA Decision Due to Procedural Irregularity

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·12 Sept 2019

Upper Tribunal Grants Claimant ESA Based on Right to Reside

The Upper Tribunal ruled that the claimant had the right to reside in the UK for the purpose of claiming ESA, based on her status as a worker under EU law.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·27 Aug 2019

UK Determined as Competent State for Carer's Allowance Claim

Allowed in PartUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·27 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Upholds Claimant's Right to Daily Living Component of Personal Independence Payment

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Aug 2019

Appeal Allowed: Equality Act Time Limit Challenged

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Aug 2019

ESA Appeal Allowed: Trust Payments Distinguished

The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal regarding the claimant's entitlement to ESA. The court ruled that certain payments from a trust should be treated as income while others should not.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·07 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside Decision Due to Error of Law

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·07 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Claimant's Appeal Against Universal Credit Refusal

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·06 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Confirms Claimant's Right to Reside for ESA

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·06 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside PIP Decision Due to Material Error of Law

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·23 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Disablement Pension Claim

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·23 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal Against PIP Denial Due to Inadequate Response

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·06 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Overturns Decision on Personal Independence Payments Due to Error of Law

The Upper Tribunal overturned a lower court's decision because it made a mistake in determining a claimant's eligibility for Personal Independence Payments. The case was sent back for a new hearing.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·17 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside Overpayment Decision in Jobseeker's Allowance Case

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal made an error of law in its overpayment decision and ordered the case to be reconsidered.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·17 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome Benefits

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·13 Aug 2019

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Right to Reside for Family Member

The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal challenging the denial of Universal Credit to a claimant who argued that she had a right to reside as a family member of her daughter, who held both British and EEA nationalities. The First-tier Tribunal's decision was set aside due to an error in law.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·17 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside ESA Overpayment Decision Due to Errors

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal made mistakes in calculating overpayments of ESA. This led to the decision being overturned and sent back for reconsideration.

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·16 Jul 2019

Upper Tribunal Rules Judge's Research Irregular But Hearing Fair

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·16 Jul 2019

Tribunal Sets Aside PIP Decision Due to Error of Law

← PreviousPage 26 · 1105 judgmentsNext →
Benefits & Welfare — Case law | VadeLab