VadeLab

Benefits & Welfare

Benefits & Welfare judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·03 Jan 2017

Nebuliser Not Considered an Aid for Managing Medication

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·09 Jan 2017

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside Decision Due to Error of Law

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·19 Jan 2017

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Verbal Communication Under PIP Scheme

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jul 2021

UKUT Dismisses Appeal on Disability Living Allowance Eligibility

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Personal Independence Payment Eligibility Criteria Upheld by Upper Tribunal

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Claimant Entitled to Standard Rate PIP After Appeal Success

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·04 Apr 2018

Upper Tribunal Rejects Appeal Over PIP Assessment

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·21 Jun 2017

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Supersession of PIP Award

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·23 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Overturns PIP Decision Due to Legal Errors

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal Against PIP Revocation Decision

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Upholds Reduced PIP Award

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Tribunal Allows Appeal on PIP Decision for Claimant in Manchester

Allowed in PartUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·15 Jan 2019

Upper Tribunal Clarifies Psychological Distress Impact on PIP Mobility Benefits

RefusedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·04 Sept 2017

Upper Tribunal Rejects Rule 43 Challenge

The Upper Tribunal refused to change its earlier decision because the applicant's arguments did not fall under the scope of Rule 43, which deals with procedural issues, not the correctness of the decision itself.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Rules Claimant Entitled to Enhanced Rate PIP

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·07 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside Decision Due to Legal Error in Special Educational Needs Case

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·20 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside Decision Due to Error in Social Engagement Assessment

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·12 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Rejects Appeal Against ESA Termination

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·12 Dec 2016

Claimant Wins Appeal for Fresh Hearing on ESA Decision

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·01 Dec 2016

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside First-tier Tribunal's Housing Benefit Decision

← PreviousPage 47 · 1105 judgmentsNext →
Benefits & Welfare — Case law | VadeLab