
Employment Law judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The claimant requested interim relief from an employer following alleged unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure. However, the Employment Tribunal denied this request because there were unresolved facts about the disclosure and reasons for termination, making it unlikely the claim would succeed in full proceedings.
The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of the workers who were dismissed without proper notice from their employer. As a result, the employer must pay a protective award to compensate for this failure. This decision was made by Employment Judge Ramsden on 19 May 2026.
In a case heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal, an employee successfully claimed unauthorised wage and holiday pay deductions from their employer. The judge ruled that the employer must not make such deductions, awarding the claimant compensation for both issues.
An Employment Tribunal in Bury St Edmunds dismissed a worker's claims of discrimination, harassment, and unfair dismissal against their employer. The tribunal ruled that the employer did not discriminate based on association with protected characteristics since similar treatment was applied to everyone.
The Employment Tribunal dismissed a worker’s case because they did not attend hearings and failed to submit required information. The judge decided there was no reason to reconsider the original decision.
In this case, an employee's claims against their employer and other individuals were dismissed because they had signed a settlement agreement that resolved all disputes. The Employment Tribunal ruled there was no reasonable chance of success for the claimant’s complaints.
In this Employment Tribunal case, the claimant won against their employer who had deducted money from their wages without permission and did not pay them for holidays they were entitled to. The judge ruled that these actions by the employer were unlawful.
The Employment Tribunal dismissed an unfair dismissal claim because the worker did not have enough time with their employer (less than two years). This is necessary to bring such a case under UK law.
An Employment Tribunal has ruled that the worker's claims against their employer for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and whistleblowing have no chance of succeeding. The case was therefore struck out or dismissed.
In this Employment Tribunal case, a worker claimed they faced unfair treatment after making protected disclosures about health and a person issues at their workplace. While a person of these claims were successful regarding negative references given to potential employers, others were not upheld by the tribunal.
A worker won their unfair dismissal case against an online retailer at Leeds Employment Tribunal. However, the compensation was reduced by 80% due to contributory conduct and the Polkey principle. The tribunal also ruled that no enhancement of compensation applied for breach of ACAS Code.
In this employment law case, the Employment Tribunal decided to strike out the respondents' responses because they failed to comply with court orders and did not actively pursue their case. This highlights the need for parties to follow tribunal procedures carefully.
In this case, an employment tribunal found that an employer had made unlawful wage deductions and failed to comply with contract terms concerning notice periods. As a result, the employer was ordered to compensate affected employees.
An employment tribunal has denied an application by a worker seeking reconsideration of a previous ruling. The judge ruled that there was no reasonable chance for changing the original judgment, upholding the principle that legal decisions should not be reopened unless absolutely necessary.
In this case, an Employment Tribunal ruled that the claimant was not considered a worker because they provided services through their a company with control over their own schedule. As such, their claims for unpaid wages and compensation were dismissed.
Workers from Bawtry Carbon Limited sought protective awards but were unsuccessful as an existing award had been granted to Unite the Union on their behalf.
In this case, an Employment Tribunal found that the employer did not follow proper procedures when making redundancies. As a result, affected workers received compensation under protective awards rules.
In this case, an employee successfully challenged their wrongful and unfair dismissal from a motor group company. The judge ruled in favour of the employee, emphasising that employers must follow fair procedures when dismissing staff.
In this case, an employee brought a claim against their employer for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. However, the Employment Judge dismissed these claims as the employee had not been employed by the employer for two years and there was no breach of contract. The unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay claims were withdrawn.