
Information Rights & Regulatory judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Upper Tribunal upheld the revocation of an a person's licence because the a person failed to comply with the requirement to have a transport manager. The Tribunal found that the a person did not engage properly with the proceedings and did not meet the necessary legal standards.
The Upper Tribunal ruled that the revocation of an a person's licence was set aside because the 'Propose to Revoke' letter was poorly constructed and lacked sufficient reasons. This highlights the importance of proper communication in administrative decisions.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a Traffic Commissioner's decision to revoke an operator's licence. The decision was overturned because the Commissioner made an error of law based on incorrect information.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a Traffic Commissioner's decision to revoke an a person's a person. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision lacked sufficient reasoning and violated procedural protections.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal challenging the revocation of a public service vehicle operator's licence. The Commissioner revoked the licence because the operator failed to provide necessary documentation within the required timeframe.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a decision to revoke an a person's licence because the Commissioner made an error of law by failing to consider all relevant evidence.
The Upper Tribunal rejected an appeal against the revocation of an operating licence due to the company's failure to notify changes in ownership and maintain good repute. The decision was based on the company's non-compliance with licensing conditions under the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995.
The Upper Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the First-tier Tribunal made a mistake by cancelling the green deal plan instead of reducing the sanction. This decision was based on the Energy Act 2011.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal, confirming the inclusion of a worker in the barred list for endangering a vulnerable adult. The worker was found to have acted improperly during an incident involving a vulnerable adult.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal challenging the refusal of an application to vary an a person's licence due to unsuitability and lack of availability of the proposed a company. The court found that the Department for Infrastructure was not 'plainly wrong' in refusing the application.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal by the claimant against the decision of the Traffic Commissioner for the North East Traffic Area. The claimant sought to add a new operating centre to their existing licence but failed to meet the statutory requirements under the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995.