
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £304 per week for a property in Walton-on-Thames. They took into account the property's condition, location, and market comparables, ensuring the rent was fair and within statutory limits.
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the monthly pitch fees for several a person homes in a protected a person, reducing the proposed fees slightly. The decision was based on the current condition of the a person and the services provided.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £892, excluding water rates and council tax. This decision applies to the tenancy starting from July 14, 2019.
The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £1,950 to £1,520 per month, considering the condition of the property and the financial impact on the tenants.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that service charges must be calculated using the 1.04% apportionment rate specified in the lease, rejecting a higher rate used by the management company. This decision ensures that tenants are charged fairly according to their lease agreements.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £700, excluding water rates and council tax but including some services. This decision is based on the Housing Act 1988.
The Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase and decided on a fair market rent for a a person in Colchester. They considered the terms of the tenancy agreement and the a person's condition, setting the new rent at £520 per month starting from April 1, 2024.
The First-tier Tribunal rejected a landlord's request to bypass consultation requirements for upgrading the water supply to a property. The tribunal ruled that a person might face prejudice if the landlord was allowed to skip consultations, especially since the cost of the works is substantial and alternative methods have not been fully explored.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass consultation requirements for urgent structural repairs in a residential property. The repairs were deemed essential and urgent to prevent further damage and ensure safety.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant was in breach of their lease by making unauthorised alterations to the property, storing materials, and using the property for business purposes. The tenant was found to have violated several covenants in the lease.