
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal approved an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site based on the Retail Price Index (RPI). The tenants argued that the site was deteriorating, but the Tribunal found their arguments lacking in evidence.
The First-tier Tribunal decided to approve an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site, ensuring it aligns with the Retail Price Index (RPI). The decision was made considering the terms of the agreement and the relevant legislation.
The First-tier Tribunal decided to approve an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site in line with the Retail Price Index (RPI). The respondents argued that the site needed significant repairs and improvements, but the Tribunal found that the increase was reasonable and did not require additional a person.
The First-tier Tribunal approved an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site in line with the Retail Prices Index (RPI). The Tribunal rejected arguments that the increase was unreasonable due to poor site conditions.
The First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber decided to approve an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site based on the Retail Prices Index (RPI). The Tribunal ruled that the increase was reasonable and in line with the legal requirements.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided that increasing the pitch fee for a mobile home site was reasonable if it matched the Retail Price Index (RPI). This decision was made according to the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
The First-tier Tribunal approved an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site in Exeter. The increase was based on the Retail Price Index (RPI) as required by the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip consulting tenants about urgent roof repairs because of safety concerns and the risk of water damage to the building.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that service charges for up to 5 full-time a person for the provision of services are reasonable under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The applicant, a tenant, sought a determination of the liability to pay and reasonableness of service charges for the provision of a person. The tribunal considered the level of charges, the number of a person, and the effectiveness of their work.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the borough could pass on the increased insurance costs to a person, finding the increase reasonable and proportionate due to the impact of the a person Tower fire.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided that a tenant's objections to service charges were unfounded. The tribunal found that the charges were reasonable and in line with the lease terms.