
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed the landlord to remove asbestos from a bike store without consulting the a person because of urgent health and safety concerns.
The First-tier Tribunal upheld a financial penalty against the owner of a House in Multiple Occupation (a person) for failing to license a person and for breaching management regulations. The owner was fined £30,000.
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the financial penalties imposed on the claimant for unlicensed lettings because of procedural mistakes in the notices and the claimant's health problems.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the reasonableness of a service charge increase for a tenant. The tenant challenged the increase, arguing it was unreasonable. However, the tribunal found the increase reasonable due to the extension of the warden service to 24-hour cover.
The First-tier Tribunal appointed a person as the new manager for a residential a person because the previous manager, a person a person, failed to provide proper service charge accounts and fulfill his duties satisfactorily.
The First-tier Tribunal rejected a landlord's request to bypass the consultation process for urgent works on a multi-tenant building. The decision was based on insufficient evidence and compliance issues.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass the usual consultation process for urgent repairs needed due to significant water leaks and insurance issues. The decision emphasises the need for prompt action to avoid further damage.
In a recent case, a a company was ordered to pay a landlord's costs and refund the a person fee after serving a claim notice. The decision was made by the First-tier Tribunal under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the reasonableness of different service charges for a mobile home park. They found some charges to be fair and others to be unreasonable.
The First-tier Tribunal appointed a new manager for a property because the previous manager failed to perform his duties properly. This decision was made after the previous manager did not produce service charge accounts and did not comply with certain requirements.