Claimant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the claimant was entitled to manage the property under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The claimant successfully argued that they met the requirements set out in the Act.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to acquire the right to manage the property if they satisfy the requirements of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant successfully obtained the right to manage the property under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
📜 Headnote Official document
The claimant applied to the First-tier Tribunal for a declaration that they were entitled to acquire the right to manage the property under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The Tribunal granted the claimant's application, finding that the claimant had satisfied the necessary conditions for acquiring the right to manage the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AR/LRM/2021/0039 Property : [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS], 12 & 14 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] Solicitors Type of Application : Application in relation to the denial of the Right to Manage Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] MA [NAME] and venue of consideration : Paper :REMOTE 21 June 2022 Date of Decision : 30 June 2022
DECISION
The Tribunal declares that on the relevant date of 19 July 2021 the Applicant [COMPANY] was entitled to acquire the right to manage the property known as [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] 12 & 14 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] under the provisions of he Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
Reasons
1 On 19 July 2021 (the relevant date) the Applicant served notice on the Respondents claiming the right to manage the property situate and known as [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] 12 and 14 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the property) with effect from 2 December 2021 (page 47).
2 The Respondent acknowledged that they had received the Applicant’s notice but disputed its validity in a counter-notice dated 19 August 2021. The counter notice (pp 67) cited a number of sections of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 which the Respondent alleged had not been satisfied.
3 The Applicant therefore issued an application with the Tribunal on 20 September 2021 (page 70) seeking a declaration that on the relevant date it was entitled to exercise a right to manage the property under the provisions of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (the 2002 Act).
4 Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 21 November 2021 (p1077) and the paper consideration of this matter, to which all parties had consented or not objected took place on 21 June 2022.
5 An electronic bundle of documents, comprising over 1,100 pages some of which are referred to below, was prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the Tribunal for its consideration.
6 A statement of reply was served by the Respondent (p1091).No separate evidence bundle was supplied by the Respondent neither did they file any witness statements or reports in support of their position. A supplementary reply was filed by the Applicant (page 1157) supported by witness statements as referred to below.
7 The Tribunal did not physically inspect the property and considered that the issues before it could be satisfactorily resolved without the need for a physical inspection.
8 The 60 residential units comprising the property are split between two blocks of flats on a site with adjacent parking and one commercial unit. The present claim relates only to the residential units. Th property appears to be situate in the centre of Romford of modern construction and is assumed to be close to all amenities.
9 The Respondents’ counter notice challenged the validity of the Applicant’s claim on four grounds under the 2002 Act (see below for text). Firstly, that the Applicant had included in the application parties who were not [NAME] tenants (see s74(1)).
10 The Respondent’s argument here is that tenants who are staircasing their leases are do not qualify to take part in an RTM application until they have completed their final acquisition (ie have become 100% owners of the
leasehold). The Respondent conceded however, that a recent Upper Tribunal decision had held that a staircasing tenant was eligible to participate under the 2002 Act. They said that they would not therefore pursue this point in the present application where they recognised that First Tier Tribunal would be bound to follow the precedent set by the Upper Tribunal.
11 The Respondent’s initial objection that the notices had not been given by an [COMPANY] (s79 (5)) seems not to have been pursued further and does not appear to have any merit. The notices were given in the name of the [COMPANY] by its lawfully appointed agent, [NAME]. That position is abundantly clear on the face of the documents and the Tribunal can find no fault with it.
12 The Respondent’s final two objections appear to be very similar: either that the notices of intention were not given correctly or that persons entitled were not served with the notices.
13 These objections centred around two groups of tenants where the Respondent alleged that the notices had been served on the wrong addresses and there was no guarantee that service had been properly effected.
14 The majority of the disputed service cases related to apartments owned by [NAME] which were let to short term tenants where the Respondent said that there was no guarantee that documents served at the property address would be forwarded to the landlord. In answer, the Applicant said that they had an agreement with [NAME] that documents would be served on them at their registered office. This is substantiated by witness statements at pages 1166 and 1167 (documents 109 and 110) and the Tribunal is satisfied that in the present case the relevant notices were correctly served on this corporate landlord and received by it. [NAME] had raised no objection to the application although it is noted that they had not subscribed to be a member of the [COMPANY].
15 The second group where proper service was queried by the Respondent is a smaller number of [NAME] each of whom had asked the Applicant to serve documents on them at a given address. Documents 47, 108 and 107 demonstrate these tenants preferences for service at a given address other than their own flat (pages 1160 -1161). Since the individuals concerned are all members of the [COMPANY] there can be little doubt that they were served and had received the invitation to membership as required by the legislation. The Tribunal finds this ground of objection unsubstantiated.
16 The Tribunal will therefore grant to the Applicant a declaration that it is entitled to acquire the right to manage the property known as [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] 12 and 14 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] under the provisions of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
17 The Law (Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002)
72 Premises to which Chapter applies
(1) This Chapter applies to premises if— (a) they consist of a self-contained building or part of a building, with or without appurtenant property, (b)they contain two or more flats held by [NAME] tenants, and (c)the total number of flats held by such tenants is not less than two-thirds of the total number of flats contained in the premises. (2)A building is a self-contained building if it is structurally detached. (3)A part of a building is a self-contained part of the building if— (a)it constitutes a vertical division of the building, (b)the structure of the building is such that it could be redeveloped independently of the rest of the building, and (c)subsection (4) applies in relation to it. (4)This subsection applies in relation to a part of a building if the relevant services provided for occupiers of it— (a)are provided independently of the relevant services provided for occupiers of the rest of the building, or (b)could be so provided without involving the carrying out of works likely to result in a significant interruption in the provision of any relevant services for occupiers of the rest of the building. (5)Relevant services are services provided by means of pipes, cables or other fixed installations. (6)Schedule 6 (premises excepted from this Chapter) has effect.
74 RTM companies: membership and regulations (1)The persons who are entitled to be members of a company which is a [COMPANY] in relation to premises are— (a)[NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises, and (b)from the date on which it acquires the right to manage (referred to in this Chapter as the “acquisition date”), landlords under leases of the whole or any part of the premises. (2)The appropriate national authority shall make regulations about the content and form of the memorandum of association and articles of association of RTM companies. (3)A [COMPANY] may adopt provisions of the regulations for its memorandum or articles. (4)The regulations may include provision which is to have effect for a [COMPANY] whether or not it is adopted by the company. (5)A provision of the memorandum or articles of a [COMPANY] has no effect to the extent that it is inconsistent with the regulations. (6)The regulations have effect in relation to a memorandum or articles— (a)irrespective of the date of the memorandum or articles, but (b)subject to any transitional provisions of the regulations. (7)The following provisions of the Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) do not apply to a [COMPANY]— (a)sections 2(7) and 3 (memorandum), and (b)section 8 (articles).
75 [NAME] tenants (1)This section specifies whether there is a [NAME] of a flat for the purposes of this Chapter and, if so, who it is.
(2)Subject as follows, a person is the [NAME] of a flat if he is tenant of the flat under a long lease. (3)Subsection (2) does not apply where the lease is a tenancy to which Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (c. 56) (business tenancies) applies. (4)Subsection (2) does not apply where— (a)the lease was granted by sub-demise out of a [NAME] lease other than a long lease, (b)the grant was made in breach of the terms of the [NAME] lease, and (c)there has been no waiver of the breach by the [NAME]. (5)No flat has more than one [NAME] at any one time; and subsections (6) and (7) apply accordingly. (6)Where a flat is being let under two or more long leases, a tenant under any of those leases which is [NAME] to that held by another is not the [NAME] of the flat. (7)Where a flat is being let to [NAME] under a long lease, the [NAME] shall (subject to subsection (6)) be regarded as jointly being the [NAME] of the flat.
79 Notice of claim to acquire right (1)A claim to acquire the right to manage any premises is made by giving notice of the claim (referred to in this Chapter as a “claim notice”); and in this Chapter the “relevant date”, in relation to any claim to acquire the right to manage, means the date on which notice of the claim is given. (2)The claim notice may not be given unless each person required to be given a notice of invitation to participate has been given such a notice at least 14 days before. (3)The claim notice must be given by a [COMPANY] which complies with subsection (4) or (5). (4)If on the relevant date there are only two [NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises, both must be members of the [COMPANY]. (5)In any other case, the membership of the [COMPANY] must on the relevant date include a number of [NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises which is not less than one-half of the total number of flats so contained. (6)The claim notice must be given to each person who on the relevant date is— (a)landlord under a lease of the whole or any part of the premises, (b)party to such a lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (c)a manager appointed under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (c. 31) (referred to in this Part as “the 1987 Act”) to act in relation to the premises, or any premises containing or contained in the premises. (7)Subsection (6) does not require the claim notice to be given to a person who cannot be found or whose identity cannot be ascertained; but if this subsection means that the claim notice is not required to be given to anyone at all, section 85 applies. (8)A copy of the claim notice must be given to each person who on the relevant date is the [NAME] of a flat contained in the premises. (9) Where a manager has been appointed under Part 2 of the 1987 Act to act in relation to the premises, or any premises containing or contained in the premises, a copy of the claim notice must also be given to the leasehold valuation tribunal or court by which he was appointed.
80 Contents of claim notice (1)The claim notice must comply with the following requirements. (2)It must specify the premises and contain a statement of the grounds on which it is claimed that they are premises to which this Chapter applies. (3)It must state the full name of each person who is both— (a)the [NAME] of a flat contained in the premises, and (b)a member of the [COMPANY], and the address of his flat. (4)And it must contain, in relation to each such person, such particulars of his lease as are sufficient to identify it, including— (a)the date on which it was entered into, (b)the term for which it was granted, and (c)the date of the commencement of the term. (5)It must state the name and registered office of the [COMPANY]. (6)It must specify a date, not earlier than one month after the relevant date, by which each person who was given the notice under section 79(6) may respond to it by giving a counter-notice under section 84. (7)It must specify a date, at least three months after that specified under subsection (6), on which the [COMPANY] intends to acquire the right to manage the premises. (8)It must also contain such other particulars (if any) as may be required to be contained in claim notices by regulations made by the appropriate national authority. (9)And it must comply with such requirements (if any) about the form of claim notices as may be prescribed by regulations so made.
81 Claim notice: supplementary (1)A claim notice is not invalidated by any inaccuracy in any of the particulars required by or by virtue of section 80. (2)Where any of the members of the [COMPANY] whose names are stated in the claim notice was not the [NAME] of a flat contained in the premises on the relevant date, the claim notice is not invalidated on that account, so long as a sufficient number of [NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises were members of the company on that date; and for this purpose a “sufficient number” is a number (greater than one) which is not less than one-half of the total number of flats contained in the premises on that date. (3)Where any premises have been specified in a claim notice, no subsequent claim notice which specifies— (a)the premises, or (b)any premises containing or contained in the premises, may be given so long as the earlier claim notice continues in force. (4)Where a claim notice is given by a [COMPANY] it continues in force from the relevant date until the right to manage is acquired by the company unless it has previously— (a)been withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn by virtue of any provision of this Chapter, or (b)ceased to have effect by reason of any other provision of this Chapter.
84 Counter-notices
(1)A person who is given a claim notice by a [COMPANY] under section 79(6) may give a notice (referred to in this Chapter as a “counter-notice”) to the company no later than the date specified in the claim notice under section 80(6). (2)A counter-notice is a notice containing a statement either— (a)admitting that the [COMPANY] was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises specified in the claim notice, or (b)alleging that, by reason of a specified provision of this Chapter, the [COMPANY] was on that date not so entitled, and containing such other particulars (if any) as may be required to be contained in counter-notices, and complying with such requirements (if any) about the form of counter-notices, as may be prescribed by regulations made by the appropriate national authority. (3)Where the [COMPANY] has been given one or more counter-notices containing a statement such as is mentioned in subsection (2)(b), the company may apply to a leasehold valuation tribunal for a determination that it was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises. (4)An application under subsection (3) must be made not later than the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which the counter-notice (or, where more than one, the last of the counter-notices) was given. (5)Where the [COMPANY] has been given one or more counter-notices containing a statement such as is mentioned in subsection (2)(b), the [COMPANY] does not acquire the right to manage the premises unless— (a)on an application under subsection (3) it is finally determined that the company was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises, or (b)the person by whom the counter-notice was given agrees, or the persons by whom the counter-notices were given agree, in writing that the company was so entitled. (6)If on an application under subsection (3) it is finally determined that the company was not on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises, the claim notice ceases to have effect. (7)A determination on an application under subsection (3) becomes final— (a)if not appealed against, at the end of the period for bringing an appeal, or (b)if appealed against, at the time when the appeal (or any further appeal) is disposed of. (8)An appeal is disposed of— (a)if it is determined and the period for bringing any further appeal has ended, or (b)if it is abandoned or otherwise ceases to have effect.
90 The acquisition date (1)This section makes provision about the date which is the acquisition date where a [COMPANY] acquires the right to manage any premises. (2)Where there is no dispute about entitlement, the acquisition date is the date specified in the claim notice under section 80(7). (3)For the purposes of this Chapter there is no dispute about entitlement if— (a)no counter-notice is given under section 84, or (b)the counter-notice given under that section, or (where more than one is so given) each of them, contains a statement such as is mentioned in subsection (2)(a) of that section. (4)Where the right to manage the premises is acquired by the company by virtue of a determination under section 84(5)(a), the acquisition date is the date three months after the determination becomes final.
(5)Where the right to manage the premises is acquired by the company by virtue of subsection (5)(b) of section 84, the acquisition date is the date three months after the day on which the person (or the last person) by whom a counter-notice containing a statement such as is mentioned in subsection (2)(b) of that section was given agrees in writing that the company was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises. (6)Where an order is made under section 85, the acquisition date is (subject to any appeal) the date specified in the order.
Judge [NAME] 30 June 2022
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL].
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Manage Property by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Right to Manage Property in First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Manage Property by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Right to Manage Property in First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Obtains Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Manage Property by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Manage Property Despite Dissolved Respondents
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Claimant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Over Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Entitled to Manage Property - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants RTM Company Right to Manage Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The applicant's notices were correctly given by its lawfully appointed agent.
- The Tribunal was satisfied that notices to a corporate landlord were correctly served at their registered office.
- The Tribunal found that individual tenants who were members of the company had received their invitations to membership.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The respondent's argument that staircasing tenants were ineligible was not pursued due to a binding Upper Tribunal decision.
- The respondent's claim that notices were served at the wrong addresses for corporate tenants was unsubstantiated.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The claimant was declared entitled to acquire the right to manage the property.
Who was involved?
The claimant, represented by Canonbury Management, and the respondent, Avon Ground Rents Ltd.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the claimant because they satisfied the conditions outlined in the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 was applied, particularly sections 72, 74, and 79.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The claimant's argument that they had included all qualifying tenants and had served the necessary notices correctly was decisive.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the claimant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they meet all statutory requirements before applying to the Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Witness statements and the electronic bundle of documents were important in supporting the claimant's case.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is highly recommended to obtain legal advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
