VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Claimant Successfully Obtains Right to Manage Premises

Case No.

📌 In brief

The claimant successfully obtained the right to manage the premises located at 521 the address the address, through a summary judgment issued by the First-tier Tribunal.

⚖️ Legal holding

A claimant is entitled to exercise the right to manage premises under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 if they meet the statutory requirements.

Topics

right to manageleasehold reformproperty management

Provisions

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s.84(3)Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 r.9(7), r.9(8)

📖 Technical summary

The claimant successfully obtained the right to manage the premises through summary judgment.

📜 Headnote Official document

The claimant applied for a decision to acquire the right to manage premises under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The Tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to exercise the right to manage, barring the respondents from further participation in the proceedings.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BG/LRM/2024/0019 Property : 521 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [COMPANY] Respondent : [redacted] Freeholder at date of Notice) (2) [COMPANY] (purchaser of freehold unregistered owner at date of Notice) Representative for [COMPANY] : [COMPANY] of [NAME] : Right to Manage Tribunal : Judge Nicol Date of order : 22nd October 2024

ORDER

(1) The Respondents are barred from further participation in the proceedings. (2) On summary judgment, the Tribunal determines that the Applicant is entitled to exercise the right to manage.

Reasons

1. The Applicant applied under section 84(3) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 ("the Act") for a decision that, on the relevant date, they were entitled to acquire the Right to Manage premises known as [ADDRESS] (“the premises”).

2 2. The Tribunal issued directions on 20th June 2024, which were amended on 14th August 2024, containing a warning at paragraph 14 that, if the Respondents failed to comply with the directions the Tribunal may bar them from taking any further part in all or part of these proceedings and may determine all issues against them pursuant to rules 9(7) and (8) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (“the 2013 Rules”).

3. On 25th July 2024 the Tribunal issued a notice that it was minded to bar the Respondents due to their failures to comply with the directions. Representations were invited but none were received. Therefore, the Respondents are barred from further participation in the proceedings.

4. On 15th October 2024 the Applicant applied for summary judgment, as permitted under rule 9(8) of the 2013 Rules. 5. [COMPANY] was the registered freeholder of the premises at the time the Applicant served the notice on them in relation to exercising the right to manage. [COMPANY] had purchased the premises, their interest was not yet registered. Therefore, the notice was validly served and [COMPANY] could not validly serve a counter-notice.

Name: Judge Nicol Date: 22nd October 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The applicant was entitled to acquire the Right to Manage because the statutory requirements were met.
  • The Respondents were barred from further participation because they failed to comply with the Tribunal's directions.
  • The notice for exercising the right to manage was validly served on the registered freeholder.
  • The Tribunal granted summary judgment to the applicant as allowed by the rules.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The claimant was granted the right to manage the premises.

Who was involved?

The claimant and the respondents, including the registered freeholder and the purchaser of the freehold.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the claimant because they met the statutory requirements under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 and the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The claimant's compliance with the statutory requirements for obtaining the right to manage the premises.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they meet the statutory requirements to obtain the right to manage their premises.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Compliance with the directions issued by the Tribunal and the validity of the notice served by the claimant.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a party can apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for permission to appeal within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving the right to manage premises.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.