VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair a person for a property using the Maximum Fair a person formula under the a person Act 1977. This ensures the a person is fair and reasonable for the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

The capped fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Act 1977, incorporating an increase based on the Retail Price Index (RPI) and additional percentage adjustments.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rent formula

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the capped fair rent based on the Retail Price Index (RPI) increase and additional percentage adjustments as mandated by the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the Maximum Fair Rent formula. The decision was made by Judge Shepherd on 6th February 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BK/F77/2023/0414

Notice of the Tribunal [NAME] 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Shepherd [APPELLANT]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair [NAME] is £13, 498.50 Per Year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 06 February 2024

3. The amount for services is £1918.72 Per annum

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for [NAME] allowance is

N/A Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The [NAME] is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than [NAME]) where different from [NAME] entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair [NAME] to be registered is the maximum fair [NAME] as prescribed by the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999. The [NAME] that would otherwise have been registered was £17518.72 per annum including £1918.72 per annum for services (variable).

Chairman Judge Shepherd Date of decision 6th February 2024

FR24 [NAME] FIGURE X 379

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.3

X 379 Minus Y 314.3 = (A) 64.7

(A) 64.7 Divided by Y 314.3 = (B) 0.20585428

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.25585428

Last registered [NAME]* £10748.21 Multiplied by (C) = £13498.1855 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £13498.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services £1918.72

[NAME] = £15,417.22 Per Annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair [NAME], in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair [NAME] to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered [NAME] by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair [NAME] determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the [NAME] is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the [NAME] 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair [NAME].

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BK/F77/2023/0414

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

:

Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 70, [NAME] 1977

Tribunal : Judge Shepherd and Sarah Phillips MRICS

Date of Summary Reasons

: 13th February 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £13498.50 per annum will be registered as the fair [NAME] with effect from 6th February 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair [NAME] by the [NAME], the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the [NAME] 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not carry out an inspection. [NAME] has carried out an inspection of the property on 13th February 2024.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and landlord.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market [NAME] for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £26,000.00per annum From this level of [NAME] we have made adjustments in relation to: • The tenant’s repair liability under the tenancy agreement; • No white goods provided within the tenancy; • No floor covering / curtains being provided within the tenancy; • Unmodernised kitchen; • No central heating.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

[NAME]

£26,000.00 per annum

Less

The tenant’s repair liability under the tenancy agreement (5%); No white goods provided within the tenancy (5%); No floor covering / curtains being provided within the tenancy (5%); Unmodernised kitchen (5%); No central heating (5%).

£6,500.00 Equals

£19,500.00 per annum

Less Scarcity approx. 20%

£3,900.00

Equals

£15,600.00 per annum Plus services

£1,918.72 [NAME]

£17,518.72 per annum

3

Decision 8. The uncapped fair [NAME] initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £ 17,518.72 per annum. The capped [NAME] for the property according to the provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 is calculated at £13,948.50. The calculation of the capped [NAME] is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower [NAME] of £13,948.50 is to be registered as the fair [NAME] or this property.

Chairman: Judge Shepherd

13th February 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was determined by applying the maximum fair rent formula.
  • The previous registered rent was increased by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • A 5% increase was added because this was a second or subsequent application since February 1, 1999.
  • The final calculated fair rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The Tribunal considered the open market rent for the property to be £26,000 per annum before adjustments.
  • Adjustments were made for the tenant's repair liability, lack of white goods, no floor coverings/curtains, an unmodernised kitchen, and no central heating.
  • An adjustment for scarcity was applied, reducing the rent by approximately 20%.
  • The capped rent of £13,948.50 was registered as the fair rent because it was lower than the uncapped rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent for a property using the Maximum Fair Rent formula.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Maximum Fair Rent formula to ensure the rent was fair and reasonable.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent formula were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was ensuring the rent was fair and reasonable for the tenant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined fairly using the Maximum Fair Rent formula.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the details are provided in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.