VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £1,008 per month for a property, adjusting the market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977, ensuring tenants receive a fair rent that reflects the property's actual value.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the market rent and necessary deductions.

Topics

tenancy disputesfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,008 per month for a property, considering the market rent and necessary adjustments. The decision was made under the Rent Act 1977 and took into account the lack of improvements and scarcity of similar properties. Judge I Mohabir presided over the case.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BH/F77/2024/0257

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge I [NAME] [NAME] (EST MAN) FRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] C [NAME]

1. The fair rent is 1008.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 22 October 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 1,192.50 per month prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of decision 22 October 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 388.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 320.2

X 388.6 Minus Y 320.2 = (A) 68.4

(A) 68.4 Divided by Y 320.2 = (B) 0.2136164

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2636164

Last registered rent* 943.50 Multiplied by (C) = 1192.22 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1192.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1192.50 Per Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference:

LON/00BH/F77/2024/0257

Property:

8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant: `

[NAME]

Landlord:

[APPELLANT] of Objection:

21 March 2024

Type of Application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal:

Judge I [NAME]

[NAME] (EST MAN) FRICS

Date of Extended Reasons

: 22 October 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £1,008 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 October 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT EXTENDED REASONS

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background 1. Following an objection from the landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the documentary evidence only.

Evidence 3. No written submissions were received from either party.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area of Waltham Forest, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1,800 per calendar month.

5. For the avoidance of doubt, the avoidance of doubt, the Tribunal did not consider the sum of £3,930 spent by the landlord for minor repairs and redecorations carried out on or about 22 September 2023 to be improvements because they were done pursuant to its repairing obligations.

6. From this level of rent we have made global adjustments in relation to:

For the, the dated kitchen and bathroom, tenant’s floor coverings, curtains, white goods, the tenant’s internal decoration obligation under the terms of the tenancy and the absence of central heating and double glazing.

7. After deducting the amount for services, the Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

8. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£1,800

Less

Deductions above

)

) 30%

£540 )

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£252

£1,008

9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,008 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The rent has not been capped under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 as it is below MFR of £1,192.50 per calendar month.

Tribunal Judge: [NAME]: 22 October 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These extended reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. Any application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition and local rental market rates.
  • The fair rent includes a reasonable service charge for communal facilities.
  • The fair rent calculation takes into account various factors such as the condition and characteristics of the property.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent calculation is based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £1,008 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the market rent and adjusted it based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to adjust the market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and local rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the market rent and the property's condition.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.