First-tier Tribunal Approves Pitch Fee Increase Based on Inflation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal approved an increase in the monthly pitch fee for a mobile home based on inflation data. The respondents did not challenge the proposal and were given the opportunity but failed to respond.
⚖️ Legal holding
A site owner is entitled to determine a new pitch fee based on consumer prices index inflation rate unless factors in Schedule 1 paragraph 18 of the Mobile Homes Act 1983 apply.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the new pitch fee for a mobile home based on inflation data and found no grounds to oppose the increase.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new pitch fee for a mobile home based on the Consumer Prices Index inflation rate, finding no factors to oppose the increase as proposed by the site owner.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
BIR/44UE/PHI/2025/0043 Property : 38 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : None Respondents : [redacted] : None Type of application : Application by site owner for determination of new level of pitch fee – Mobile Homes Act 1983 Schedule 1 para 16
Tribunal member :
Judge C Goodall
Date and place of hearing : Paper determination Date of decision : 14 July 2026
DECISION © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026
2 Background
1. The Applicant has applied for a determination of the new pitch fee for the Property, which is sited on the [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].
2. A notice of increase of pitch fee (“the Notice of Increase”) was sent by the Applicant to the Respondents on 29 April 2025 proposing an increase in the fee from £187.02 per month to £191.88 per month, effective from 1 June 2025.
3. The pitch fee increase sought is based on a Consumer Prices Index inflation rate of 2.6%, being the rate published for the month of March 2025.
4. The application to the Tribunal was dated 29 August 2025.
5. Directions for the conduct of the application were issued by Judge Barlow on 4 January 2026. The Respondents were directed to complete a response form by 30 January 2026 indicating whether they wished the Tribunal to hold a hearing on the application and their reasons for opposing a pitch fee increase. The Tribunal has not received any response to these directions from the Respondents.
6. I am therefore determining the application on the papers.
Law
7. Schedule 1 to the Mobile Homes Act 1983 sets out terms which are implied into the agreements between site owners and pitch owners on protected sites.
8. Paragraph 20 of that Schedule provides that unless it would be unreasonable having regard to factors set out in paragraph 18 of the Schedule, there is a presumption that the pitch fee shall increase by a percentage calculated by reference to the last consumer prices index published before the day in which the notice of increase was served as it relates to the index published 12 months before.
Discussion
9. I have reviewed the Applicant’s papers and am satisfied that:
a. The last review date prior to service of the Notice of Increase was 1 June 2024;
b. The Notice of Increase was served at least 28 days before the proposed date of a change in the pitch fee;
3 c. The application to the Tribunal was brought within 3 months of the review date;
d. The proposed increase of 2.6% is based on the correct consumer prices index inflation data (133.00 March 2024: 136.5 March 2025);
e. There are no factors raised by either party to displace the presumption that the pitch fee should increase by the CPI inflation rate;
f. The Respondents have had the opportunity to challenge the proposed pitch fee increase but have not taken up that opportunity.
Decision
10. I determine that the new pitch fee for the Property from 1 June 2025 is £191.88 per month. Appeal 11. Any appeal against this decision must be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Prior to making such an appeal the [NAME] must apply, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal within 28 days of the date of issue of this decision (or, if applicable, within 28 days of any decision on a review or application to set aside) identifying the decision to which the appeal relates, stating the grounds on which that party intends to rely in the appeal, and stating the result sought by the party making the application.
Judge C Goodall First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Quashes Financial Penalties for Property Licence Breach…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Penalty for Unlicensed Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent After Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Recognises Burne Jones House Tenants Association
- Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Immigration Appeal Allowed: Tribunal Finds Errors in Credibility Assessment
- Employment Tribunal Employment Tribunal Allows Unfair Dismissal Claim Against Employer
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The last review date for the pitch fee was correctly identified as June 1, 2024.
- The notice of the pitch fee increase was served more than 28 days before the proposed change date.
- The application to the Tribunal was submitted within three months of the review date.
- The proposed 2.6% increase was based on the correct consumer prices index inflation data.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal decided to increase the pitch fee to £191.88 per month based on the Consumer Prices Index inflation rate of 2.6%.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the proposed increase in the pitch fee from £187.02 to £191.88 per month.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to allow the increase based on the Consumer Prices Index inflation rate, as no factors displaced the presumption under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Mobile Homes Act 1983 Schedule 1 para 16 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the application of the Consumer Prices Index inflation rate to determine the pitch fee increase.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case, allowing the increase in the pitch fee.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, the decision means that a pitch fee increase can be granted based on the Consumer Prices Index inflation rate, provided no factors displace the presumption.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents that mattered included the notice of increase of pitch fee and the Consumer Prices Index data.
