VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property in central London. They took into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The fair rent was set at £14200 per year, starting from 30 September 2021.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for the property's condition and scarcity in the area.

Topics

fair rent determinationproperty valuation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and market scarcity.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property located in central London, considering the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The fair rent was set at £14200 per year, effective from 30 September 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2021/0131

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £14200 Per year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 30 September 2021

3. The amount for services is £3716.37 Per year

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £15776.50 per year including £3716.37 per year for services prescribed by the Order.

Chairman E [NAME] of decision 30 September 2021

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 305.5

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 285.6

X 305.5 Minus Y 285.6 = (A) 19.9

(A) 19.9 Divided by Y 285.6 = (B) 0.06968

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.11968

Last registered rent* 14090 Multiplied by (C) = 15776.26 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 15776.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £15776.50 Per year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00BK/F77/2021/0131

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 11 December 2020

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 2 September 2021 hearing

remote hearing on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The registered rent with effect from 30 September 2021 is £14200 per year.

This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in an electronic bundle, the contents of which I have recorded.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 26 October 2020 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £16200 per year for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £14090 per year inclusive of £2854.90 service charge which had been registered by the rent officer on 3 December 2018 with effect from 22 December 2018.

3. On 9 December 2020, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £15220 per year inclusive of £3716.37 service charge with effect from 22 December 2020.

4. On 11 December 2020 the tenant objected to the registered rent.

5. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the application being dealt with on the papers. Neither party objected. Written representations were received from the tenant, no representations were received from or on behalf of the landlord.

The Evidence

6. The tenant stated that the flat, had been affected by a flood from the flat above. The landlord had inspected the flat in May 2021 however no repairs had been carried out. Long standing matters remained outstanding.

The Accommodation

7. This purpose built block is situated in a sought after area convenient for the facilities of central London. The accommodation which is on the third floor comprises two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, it has partial central heating. The services provided are cleaning and lighting of the common parts, lift, entryphone and concierge.

The Law

8. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect if any of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

9. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation

10. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any market evidence to support their opinions of value, the Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of rental values in Marylebone and concluded that the likely market rent for the flat would be £550 per week, the annual equivalent is £28600.

11. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £28600 per year to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s

improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect

attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were generally modern or modernised, in good repair, centrally heated and double glazed with white goods, floor and window coverings. The Tribunal considered that these differences and the terms and conditions of the tenancy required a deduction of £11000 per year.

12. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £17600 per year. The Tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in central London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the market rent to reflect this element. The Tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £14200 per year.

Decision

13. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £14200 per year.

13. This is below the maximum fair rent that can be registered by virtue of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (Details are provided on the back of the decision form).

14. Accordingly the sum of £14200 per year will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 30 September 2021 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 3 November 2021

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition and local market rates.
  • Fair rent calculations are based on the Retail Price Index and previous registered rent, adjusted for inflation.
  • Fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • Fair rent takes into account the current market conditions and the state of the property.
  • The fair rent is set by the Tribunal based on the Rent Act 1977.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property in central London was set at £14200 per year, effective from 30 September 2021.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area when arguing for a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and market scarcity was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.