VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £1,024.00 per month. They considered factors like the property's condition and the availability of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties in the local area.

Topics

fair rent determinationrent act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,024.00 per calendar month for a property, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. The decision took into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BD/F77/2020/0056

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were First Floor Flat, 3 Little St. Leonards, London, [POSTCODE]

Judge J [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1024.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 28 April 2021

3. The amount for services is £78.04 Per Calendar Month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

N/A

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1134.50 per month including £78.04 per month for services.

Chairman Mr [NAME] Lawyer Date of decision 28 April 2021

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296.0

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 278.1

X 296 Minus Y 278.1 = (A) 17.9

(A) 17.9 Divided by Y 278.1 = (B) 0.064365

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.114365

Last registered rent* 1,018.00 Multiplied by (C) = 1,134.42 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1,134.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,134.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Ref: LON/00BD/F77/2020/0056

Type of Determination: P (Paper) Remote

Property: 3, Little St Leonards, London, [POSTCODE]

Landlord: [COMPANY]: [APPELLANT]

Tenant: [Ms/Mrs] [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] of application: Determination of a fair rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal members: Tribunal Judge [NAME] of Decision: 28th April 2021

Date of Reasons: 23rd June 2021

REASONS

Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote determination on the papers, which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and all issues could be determined on paper.

Background On 11th November 2019, the landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £1,248.74 per calendar month including a sum for services of £78.04 per calendar month.

2. The rent payable at the time of application was £1,1018per calendar month.

3. The rent of £1,018per calendar month was previously registered on 15th December 2017 with no sum attributed to services.

4. On the 19th December 2020 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £1,040per calendar month (including a fixed amount for services of £36.82/month).

5. On 22nd January 2020 the landlord objected and the matter was referred to the Tribunal.

6. The Tribunal made its determination on 28th April 2021 and the landlord subsequently requested Reasons. The Tribunal used Google Streetview to identify the location and property. It also considered the parties’ submissions and information on the rent register.

7. From the above sources the Tribunal finds that the property is a self- contained, converted, two bedroom first floor flat C1800-1918, with full central heating, comprising three rooms, kitchen and bath/WC.

8. Under the terms of the tenancy the landlord is liable for external repairs and decoration, and the tenant liable for internal repairs and decorations 9. All carpets, curtains and white goods were provided by the tenant.

Evidence Neither party responded to the appeal. The Law 10. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must also disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. That section also requires the Tribunal not to take into account the personal financial and other circumstances of the tenant.

11. Ordinarily, a fair rent is the market rent for the subject property discounted for ‘scarcity’ (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent that is attributable to there being a shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms – other than as to rent – to that of the regulated tenancy.

12. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1955) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that section 70 means that:

13. Ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the subject property discounted for ‘scarcity’ and 14. For the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between these comparables and the subject property).

Determination and Valuation 15. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market

letting. I.e. with carpets, curtains, white goods and in good decorative condition, and with the tenant having some internal repairing obligations.

16. The Tribunal considered the market in the area where the property is situated from its own general knowledge, and had regard to the rents provided by the Rent Officer.

17. The Tribunal found that the market rent for the property in good condition on Assured Shorthold Tenancy would be in the region of £1,600.per calendar month.

18. However, this is on the basis of a modern open market letting where the tenant has no liability to carry out repairs or decorations, nor an obligation to provide white goods, flooring, curtains. The Tribunal therefore adjusted the market rent by 20% (£320.00) to reflect the differing terms of the tenancy, the external decorative condition apparent from Streetview, white goods, curtains and flooring. The Tribunal arrived at an adjusted market rent of £1,280.00 per calendar month.

19. The Tribunal then considered the question of scarcity. We were not provided with any specific evidence on this issue therefore the Tribunal relied upon its general knowledge and experience, and determined a further deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this scarcity. This is evidenced by long local authority and housing association waiting lists. The tribunal therefore determined that the uncapped fair rent is £1,024.00 per calendar month including services.

20. This is below the maximum fair rent that can be registered by virtue of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair rent) Order 1999, (details provided on the back of the decision form).

21. The landlord sought an element in the rent for services of £78.04 per calendar month and provided a schedule setting out the services. The Rent Officer set a figure of £36.82 per calendar month. The Tribunal finds that the amount set by the Rent Officer is too low, and that sought by the landlord to provide value to the tenant, and accordingly we determine the services element within the rent of £1,024.00 per calendar month to be £78.04. The new registered rent takes effect from 28th April 2021, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

Chairman: J Shepherd

Dated: 23 June 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the scarcity of similar properties.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that takes into account the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent calculated according to relevant legislation.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified as leading to a decision against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £1,024.00 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the scarcity of similar properties in their area when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Information on the rent register and the property's condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.