VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, considering the property's condition and market rent levels. The rent was set at £2,662.40 per quarter.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal, taking into account the property's condition and market rent levels.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977property condition assessment

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including the property's condition and market rent levels.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £2,662.40 per quarter for a property, considering the property's condition and market rent levels, and applying the capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/F77/2019/0195

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Miss [NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT] MA MRICS

Landlord [NAME] ([COMPANY]) [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The fair rent is 2662.40 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 13 December 2019

3. The amount for services is 89.22 Per Quarter

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None.

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £2925.00 per Quarter including £89.22 per for services.

Chairman Miss [NAME] of decision 13th December 2019

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 290.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.1

X 290.4 Minus Y 275.1 = (A) 15.3

(A) 15.3 Divided by Y 275.1 = (B) 0.055616

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.105616

Last registered rent* 2645.50 Multiplied by (C) = 2924.91 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 2925.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £2925.00 Per Quarter

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : KA/LON/00AP/F77/2019/0195 Property : 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] [NAME] : Not applicable Respondent : [redacted] : [COMPANY] of Application : To register a new fair rent Tribunal Members : Ms [NAME] Mrs [NAME] MA MRICS Date and venue : 13 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 8 January 2020

DECISION

Background

1. On 6 August 2019, the landlord applied to the rent officer for the re- registration of a fair rent of £2,844.47 per quarter for the above property.

2

2. The rent payable at the time of the application was £2,645.50 per quarter.

3. The rent was previously registered on 6 September 2017 with effect from 10 September 2017, following a determination by the rent officer.

4. On 27 September 2019, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £2,686 per quarter for the property with effect from 10 October 2019.

5. By a letter dated 8 October 2019, the landlord objected to the rent determined by the rent officer and the matter was referred to the First- tier Tribunal.

Inspection

6. The Tribunal inspected the exterior of the block in which the property is situated on 13 December 2019. [ADDRESS] is a 1930s block, set back from the main road, which is part-brick and part-rendered. The block is in poor decorative condition externally. There are small communal gardens to the front of the block and a larger communal garden to the rear, which is overlooked by rear balconies.

7. The Tribunal made several unsuccessful attempts to contact the tenant via an answerphone at ground floor level but there was no reply. Accordingly, the Tribunal was unable to inspect the interior of the property.

Evidence

8. The Tribunal considered the documents in the Tribunal file which include documents supplied by the rent officer. The rent officer indicated that the flat comprises three rooms, kitchen, bathroom and WC.

9. A hearing was offered but neither party attended an oral hearing.

The law

10. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant, or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

3 11. Section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 states that “for the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in the locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.”

12. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and

(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).

13. When a fair rent is already registered and an application for a new fair rent to be determined by the Rent Officer is made on or after 1 February 1999, there is a limit on the amount that can be registered as the fair rent. This limit is sometimes referred to as the “capped rent”. If the fair rent that the Tribunal would otherwise have determined is above the capped rent only the lower, capped figure can be registered as the fair rent.

14. The capped rent is calculated in accordance with a formula set out in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. It is arrived at by increasing the amount of the existing registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index since the date of that earlier registration and then adding a further 7.5% or 5%. The 7.5% addition will apply in respect of the first application for re-registration of a fair rent since 1 February 1999 and the 5% addition will apply in the case of all subsequent applications.

15. In all cases where the capping rule applies, the Tribunal will first decide what the fair rent would be irrespective of the statutory limit. It will then calculate the capped rent. If the figure reached by the Tribunal is above or the same as the capped rent, the capped rent will be registered as the fair rent. If it is below the capped rent, the lower figure will be registered and the cap will not apply.

4 Valuation

16. In reaching its determination, Tribunal first determined the rent that the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market in the condition considered usual for a modern letting. It did this by having regard to Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of Haringey.

17. It did not do so by reference to specific comparable properties but rather the Tribunal had regard to its general knowledge obtained through regularly carrying out valuations in different areas of General London including Haringey.

18. The Tribunal concluded that the likely market rent would be £320 per week.

19. However, on the basis of the information available to the Tribunal, the actual property is not currently in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent to allow for the differences between the condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the subject property.

20. The Tribunal considered that a deduction 10% should be made to reflect the lack of central heating which is noted on the rent register.

21. Further, the Tribunal has deducted 10% to reflect differences between the usual terms of a market letting and the terms of a Rent Act 1977 tenancy under which that the tenant is responsible for the provision of carpets, curtains and white goods.

22. Appling these deductions in the total sum of £64 to the hypothetical annual market rent, the adjusted market rent for the property is £256 per week.

23. The Tribunal is aware of judicial guidance relating to section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 including the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] v [NAME] Tribunal [2002] EWHC 835 (Admin) which required it to consider scarcity over a wide area rather than limit it to a particular locality.

24. Greater London is now considered to be an appropriate area to use as a yardstick for measuring scarcity and it is clear that there is a substantial measure of scarcity in Greater London. The Tribunal considers that, taking Greater London as the appropriate area and applying its knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal, it is proper to apply a scarcity element in the region of 20% (£51.20) which must be deducted from the adjusted rent of £256 per week.

5 25. Applying these deductions to the hypothetical market rent, the uncapped fair rent is £204.80 per week or £2,662.40 per quarter.

6. Decision

26. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply in the present case because the uncapped rent of £2,662.40 per quarter is below the capped rent of £2,925 per quarter.

Accordingly, the sum of £2,662.40 per quarter will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 13.12.19 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.

Judge Hawkes

8 January 2020

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal, considering the property's condition and market rent levels.
  • The fair rent calculation takes into account the Retail Price Index and relevant regulations under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The maximum fair rent is calculated according to statutory orders and Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent reflects the current market conditions and the state of repair of the property, within statutory caps.
  • The fair rent is calculated based on the previous registered rent and the Retail Price Index.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The fair rent does not adequately reflect the property's condition and market comparables, leading to an adjustment against the claimant.
  • The claim is dismissed due to the fair rent not being recalculated according to the latest market conditions and property repairs.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £2,662.40 per quarter for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market rent levels, applying the Rent Act 1977 and the capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the market rent levels.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market rent levels.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Documents related to the property's condition and market rent levels were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.